- May 29, 2019
- 11,943
- 12,226
- 23,180
No. There have been years when other athletes deserved it more.
Of course, that was my point. It's that year.
No. There have been years when other athletes deserved it more.
clearly he and his team think differently.... who are we to question how he should prepare for the rest of the seasonFW is irrelevant (for his tour's preparation) for Pogacar. It will not matter if he races it or not.
I think Pogacar just doesn't care about FW tbh. Nothing to do with his preparationclearly he and his team think differently.... who are we to question how he should prepare for the rest of the season
if he decides to do one more week of preparation on long climbs there's clearly a reason....
both things probablyI think Pogacar just doesn't care about FW tbh. Nothing to do with his preparation
Looks like a snail.this is what he has started to work on after roubaix, sustained efforts on long climbs at altitude (above 2000m)
Ever since the 2024 Tour Pogacar has not looked the same on longer climbs.
In 2024 he was using a higher cadence (almost Armstrong like) and he looked super smooth.
In 2025 and 2026 he is grinding a bigger gear (his power training for the classics probably has an influence on this)
To me personally he doesn't look as efficient as 2024.
I tend to agree with you, also to me he doesn't look the same, imo the move to the aero bike and his specific focus on classics have something to do with this.Ever since the 2024 Tour Pogacar has not looked the same on longer climbs.
In 2024 he was using a higher cadence (almost Armstrong like) and he looked super smooth.
In 2025 and 2026 he is grinding a bigger gear (his power training for the classics probably has an influence on this)
To me personally he doesn't look as efficient as 2024.
I tend to agree with you, also to me he doesn't look the same, imo the move to the aero bike and his specific focus on classics have something to do with this.
But we have still seen two performances at a similar level to 2024 TDF, in the dauphine stage and in lombardy 2025
peyreguades was a tt, difficult to comparePeyreguades and Hautacam were awesome as well.
Again this conversation. He doesn't need to be at his best. 95% is enough to win the Tour.Ever since the 2024 Tour Pogacar has not looked the same on longer climbs.
In 2024 he was using a higher cadence (almost Armstrong like) and he looked super smooth.
In 2025 and 2026 he is grinding a bigger gear (his power training for the classics probably has an influence on this)
To me personally he doesn't look as efficient as 2024.
peyreguades was a tt, difficult to compare
in hautacam he was not at his 24 tdf level, in the last KMs he was a bit cooked, but we don't know how much the crash he had the day before affected him
those were really good performances, but not at pdb and isola level.The gaps in Hautacam were big and the conditions were difficult. Pogacar was cooked but others were even more. All things considered he wasn't that far off Riis record (the stage was more difficult and it was hot).
Peyreguades was great because he convincingly beat Vingegaard, who (according to his own words) did a very good performance and demolished the rest on that moderate climb.
Which is probably never. To me it makes more sense to either race P-R or Giro, in both cases the Ardennes triple isn't happeningIt's official, no FW this year. Probably will only race it again if he wants to win the Ardennes treble.
PdB was indeed his best, but Peyragudes ITT, Combloux and Lombardia last year were not far off. The Isola stage was also not that hard. You can look in my climbers ranking thread were I analyzed all these performances.those were really good performances, but not at pdb and isola level.
In pdb the conditions were far from ideal to do a great w/kg performance, the stage was almost 200km with more than 5000m of climbing, in the valleys there were more than 30 degrees, and he still did much better w/kg numbers than in hautacam.
Isola was a bit less impressive but still a monster performance considering the difficulty of the stage
Which is probably never. To me it makes more sense to either race P-R or Giro, in both cases the Ardennes triple isn't happening
PdB was indeed his best, but Peyragudes ITT, Combloux and Lombardia last year were not far off. The Isola stage was also not that hard. You can look in my climbers ranking thread were I analyzed all these performances.
Heat is also not always the same. The PdB stage actually started with moderate temperatures, only in the last short valley was it over 30°, while in Hautacam it was 34° to 36° degrees the whole day.
I agree but we and they could all see that P-R negatively affects you in Amstel, I don't think he'll combine the two anymoreLast year, he raced the Ardennes treble in full AFTER Roubaix (and was damn close to winning all 3). He might do it again some year if he does not ride Romandie or Giro afterwards.
But yes, it does not make any sense to ride AGR/FW in case Pogačar aims to return to Giro (which would also likely require skipping P-R).
yes, I pretty much agree with your ranking, as I said before Lombardia and combloux were the closest to his 2024 tour level. The ITT imo can't really be comparedPdB was indeed his best, but Peyragudes ITT, Combloux and Lombardia last year were not far off. The Isola stage was also not that hard. You can look in my climbers ranking thread were I analyzed all these performances.
Heat is also not always the same. The PdB stage actually started with moderate temperatures, only in the last short valley was it over 30°, while in Hautacam it was 34° to 36° the whole day.
