Mambo95 said:
But would bonuses have made any difference? On the Tourmalet (2010), in the position of either Schleck or Contador how would bonuses have changed your approach?
Schleck tried to get a gap, but couldn't. Bonuses wouldn't have made any difference to his tactics. Alternatively, he could have been more negative and attacked in the last K from a small bunch.
With bonuses, tactically, the right move for Contador would have been to follow Schleck's wheel, gambling nothing, and fresher take him in the sprint.
So really there would have been no difference until the last 500m.
And as a fan of bunch sprints wouldn't that have made a world of difference to you. You love those stages where it comes down to the final 500m.
Whatever the arguments against time bonuses are, and i do understand them, TDF 17 2010 is not one of them. It would have been a lot more interesting with bonuses.
I think its more than 500m though. Going into the final 3k, it was obvious that andy would not get a big enough gap and we knew they would ride in together.
Andy tried once, contador tried once and then they stopped and rode together.
But with a 8 second bonus at stake that whole section would have been intriguing.
Even if they waited for the sprint, the interest would come from knowing they could attack at any time. THey probably would have tried as well. Because the stage win would be that much more important.