VoidSix said:
Most people aren't as fast as Cancellara period. That was the whole strategy of the day. Alberto isn't known for being able to ride the cobbles very well regardless.
I'm not saying Schleck is the better overall rider. I'm just saying I think that going even in the mountains while he tugged Contador up the Tourmalet might show he is ever so slightly the faster climber, and that if his chain hadn't dropped, he would've started the ITT behind Contador and might've been able to hang on.
Either way, if I were Contador I would be a bit worried for the coming season. Schleck has a few years to continue to improve and Contador is pretty much in his prime for the next one or two. Over four minutes last year, 39 seconds this year, and at worst equal in the climbs where he was getting slaughtered by Alberto in the climbs last year.
you know you need to look at it in its entirety ...........as a whole berto was down to andy 1:23 by stage 7, that includes the 1:13 on stage 3............
by the final ITT he is up 39 seconds, thats over a 2 minute turn around, so regardless of chaingate the strongest guy won
as far as the tormalet is concerned, not sure what you where looking at but berto looked way better than andy, and had he sprinted from 50 mtr out nothing andy could have done about it
and it just came out that berto was on antibiotics 10 days before the tour started, and apparently had stomach issues last nite to boot, according to him he slept poorly and was fatiged right from the start
yes im a berto fan, but have no issues with andy either, but you cant argue with a 2 minute turn around in the overall