- Mar 18, 2009
- 14,644
- 81
- 22,580
the sceptic said:
That is about it. Sky has become so ridiculous that their most ardent fanboys are trying to pretend it is not true.
We have fallen down the rabbit hole.
the sceptic said:
JimmyFingers said:They went full on for the classics but lacked a dominant rider to challenge Sagan and Cancellara. Saying they didn't target them is a misrepresentation of fact.
red_flanders said:The focus of this team from the get go has been to win the Tour de France. Stated goal. Not really debatable.
If they want to target the classics they will need to hire a classics team of note. Not the goal, so they don't do it and do the best they can with who they have.
Their classics team is not their A team.
They have won every race they've targeted, easily. To argue they are "average" being the #1 team in the world by a wide margin, having won the last two tours which is their stated team goal, is (again) preposterous.
EDIT: I think BroDeal said it much better. Rabbit hole indeed. Sorry I played a part.
del1962 said:So they didn't target the Giro?
red_flanders said:The focus of this team from the get go has been to win the Tour de France. Stated goal. Not really debatable.
If they want to target the classics they will need to hire a classics team of note. Not the goal, so they don't do it and do the best they can with who they have.
Their classics team is not their A team.
They have won every race they've targeted, easily. To argue they are "average" being the #1 team in the world by a wide margin, having won the last two tours which is their stated team goal, is (again) preposterous.
EDIT: I think BroDeal said it much better. Rabbit hole indeed. Sorry I played a part.
red_flanders said:Did their A-team GT rider ride the Giro? No. They sent the second string.
Rabbit hole.
del1962 said:So Uran, Henao are B Team riders.
And why do you insult me with the stupid "Rabbit Hole" bait, I thought it was against the rules, but you being a mod and all that it matters not I guess.
del1962 said:So Uran, Henao are B Team riders.
And why do you insult me with the stupid "Rabbit Hole" bait, I thought it was against the rules, but you being a mod and all that it matters not I guess.
del1962 said:However back in the real world, if McQuaid had some dirt on BC, then I would expect that it would leak out in the run up to the election
"I still believe he [Armstrong] is a phenomenal athlete and still the biggest engine ever to get on a bike, apart from maybe Chris Froome," Yates said.
Yates even asked Armstrong to write the foreword for his autobiography, It's All About the Bike. He did not.
Asked if Armstrong rode clean in 2009, Yates said: "I don't know. He came out and said he did whatever. I believe he was [clean] and certainly his performances were nothing out of this world."
Yates had left Team Sky the previous October, at the same time as the British squad restated its zero-tolerance policy. To many, particularly on Twitter, Yates was guilty by association – by his friendship with Armstrong and his work alongside other convicted or confessed drug cheats in Alberto Contador and Bjarne Riis.
In his book Yates details how the Team Sky principal, Sir Dave Brailsford, was struggling with justifying Yates's position on the team against those insinuations.
Yates had had enough. Ill health – he has had two strokes and has a pacemaker fitted to his ailing heart – meant he did not need the hassle.
The decision for Yates to leave had been made but the official announcement came only after a Sunday newspaper reported he was going as part of an anti-doping cull, "putting two and two together to make five," Yates wrote.
Some even suggested Yates's health issues were associated with doping in his riding career. He ignores those comments.
gooner said:From Yates's new book.
"I still believe he [Armstrong] is a phenomenal athlete and still the biggest engine ever to get on a bike, apart from maybe Chris Froome," Yates said.
BroDeal said:Froome! Biggest talent ever! LOL. I cannot believe they are trying to feed people this horsesh!t.
It is piling up deep over there in Britain. The big question is whether I can make money from this. There has to be natural fertilizer corporation I can invest in. It looks like the Brits are rapidly on their way to becoming world leaders in that industry--if they are not already.
the sceptic said:Is big engine a codeword for super responder?
Doesnt reflect well on Froome to be compared to Armstrong like that. And I also didnt read "Froome is clean" anywhere in that article![]()
Moose McKnuckles said:Pro cycling is like a movie with great actors but they're all bad guys.
Looks like Britain wants to become famous for more than just bad teeth, crap cuisine, hooliganism, and begging the US to help them beat up Argentina.
Parker said:Because OPQS offered him more money than Sky thought he was worth to them. That's basic budgeting.
Papa Kel said:Agree with Yates, Froome easily has the biggest natural engine... just that bloody bilharzia hampered him early.
