Jancouver said:
Kazistuta said:
Seriously, do you have trust issues?
I think your phrasing is respectful, but the substance isn't.
How far along is your team? Have you submitted yet? If not, why so?
I think I have around 10 open spots (have a prelim team) and will wait between Christmas and New Year to decide for the last ones. Still need to plough through some cycling pages though.
I don't have a trust issues and all this started when I mentioned to someone that I don't take Skidmark's team seriously because he got access to all the teams. Very simple.
This year, he could avoid this by submitting his team prior to the official start of the game but he again chose to pick 25 riders and is planning to add the rest based on what he sees around.
Look, I'm not taking away his skills and I'm regretful for all his work but the way he goes around submitting his team, I simply have to put a big asterisk next to his name, same as all those late submissions.
As per my team, it has been the same for about a week and only have four riders (different price levels) ready to swap a (single) rider in case of an injury, doping etc. otherwise I'm not planning on making any changes.
EDIT: I just sent my team to Brullnux as well and I will not make any changes unless there is major reason for that (injury etc)
Cool, whatevs. It's about 20 riders for the last 7 slots, as Brullnux said, all low-cost, low-gain. I just haven't decided what configuration I want. I also identified a few replacements for one expensive rider on my team should anything change in the last week. Either way, I've won the game twice and am hosting it, if people want me to be held to a higher standard because of it that's cool. I'll send the final team to Brullnux tomorrow; I still have 4 submissions - do you feel like that is too many and I would be influenced by them? If so, there's nothing I can really do to satisfy your skepticism. But really, for me it's just a matter of having the time to put together a team rather than anything else. I don't really care about finalizing a team 'early', that has never been the issue, I just spend a ton of time working on my team so it's hard to find the time to get it done super early. I tried extra hard this year though, so I'm close. I'll do it tomorrow.
Just want to address this comment:
This year, he could avoid this by submitting his team prior to the official start of the game but he again chose to pick 25 riders and is planning to add the rest based on what he sees around.
Why do you think you know what my motivation is? It seems like in order to reach that conclusion you'd have to be reverse engineering an argument of 'he's done well at this game and has access to riders; therefore he must use that access to the riders to do well at the game". How do you explain me winning in 2012 and having the 2nd most popular team, before I even had access to any of the teams submitted? I feel like I've been as open as I can about the fact that I couldn't care less about who other people select. I'm not sure how I can submit a team 'before' the game if I have to wait to see who submits a team before I can send it to them. Brullnux sent the first team, I asked if I could send mine, he said yes, I sent it, and I had four entries at that time (they all came in the same day). Perhaps next year we could find a non-game participant to agree early to receive my team; I just never took that step because I didn't fathom that someone might take it that seriously. It sounds like what you're saying is that any amount of flexibility allows me to gain some kind of advantage, which I also didn't imagine was the issue, so I'll address that best I can by finalizing asap.
Like I said, I'll submit my final team (save for changes based on injury/suspension info) tomorrow. Then, when the teams are published, I'll post all the riders who were on my shortlist and people can see the ones that I chose (when there were four entries) and the ones I didn't choose. (I feel like it will be clear that any of the most popular riders are ones I've already chosen for certain on my team, as I'd imagine the last ones I pick will not be obvious picks in anyone's mind) Transparency is fine, this doesn't have to be an opaque process. If for some reason you think I'm lying about how many teams I have received, I have received teams from Brullnux, Polliwop, Martin, and Hakkie2. If I'm somehow running a mysterious information-gathering racket, anyone other than these people who have submitted teams can expose me as a fraud right here in this thread.
If you or anyone has any other ideas on how I can be more clear or transparent that I'm not using my position in running this game to gain any advantage, I'm open to hearing them.