- Jul 27, 2009
- 749
- 0
- 0
elizab said:When Frankie used epo, I don't believe it was illegal. Unethical, absolutely.
Wrong. I think you're confusing the ability to test for EPO with legality. It was illegal long before a test was approved.
elizab said:When Frankie used epo, I don't believe it was illegal. Unethical, absolutely.
I think you are confusing "illegal" with a violation of sporting rules.M Sport said:Wrong. I think you're confusing the ability to test for EPO with legality. It was illegal long before a test was approved.
Ferminal said:I've come to realise that CN has very few writers. Not once has CN produced an original piece on this whole issue. In general there is a major lack of independent work. It took the TdF for them to have a "feature" on Contador.
Thoughtforfood said:I think you are confusing "illegal" with a violation of sporting rules.
Wallace said:Hi Elizabeth,
Since you're here, and since, unlike the most of the posters here, you actually have first-hand knowledge of what goes on in the world of pro cycling, I'd like to ask you a question:
Why on earth does Taylor Phinney ride for RadioShack? His dad has to know the truth about Armstrong and Bruyneel--there's no way Davis can in any way pretend that his son isn't riding for the king of the dopers. If my son was super talented and Armstrong and Co. wanted to hire him, I'd say hell no, and obviously I don't know one tenth of what DP knows. What's going on here?
TeamSkyFans said:Taylor tends to block everyone lance blocks. I think lance feeds back to him daily. He is grooming him to be a clone.
[...]
and pretty much anyone that follows me. Ive got freinds of mine who have never even mentioned lance who have been blocked. It seems if you follow any two of myself, festinagirl, maserati, or joepapp and you get blocked.
filipo said:Was this before, after, or while he was a TV announcer? What were the demands of his Telegraph position? Calling the races? Reporting on cycling news? Conducting interviews?
What was his background prior to that position? Was it in biking? Or in writing?
In other words, what were the qualities that led the Telegraph to hire him?
Thoughtforfood said:I think you are confusing "illegal" with a violation of sporting rules.
Cal_Joe said:Well, there we have it. I agree with Progressor's post and you don't. The forum is now at peace.
As far as Goober's comments, they did not enter into my thinking.
Sorry - barely following you here - reference to one side? Need more explanation regarding this bit. As far as Progressor's comments "mentally ill, deficient or a troll", there tends to be some odd logic on this forum by some posters. Some posters appear to have a belief that if they post something that is not particularly kind about LA, and someone else disagrees with their post on solid grounds, that post responder MUST be a LA fanboy (and maybe even has a man crush!!), even though the poster has not then or never has been an advocate for LA. With that last bit, I appear to be putting words into Progressor's mouth; I aplogise in advance.
Goober has been sucked into one of the endless spats that go on here every day. Based on some recent posts by moderators, this endless loop of personal attacks may be nipped in the bud.
As far as Progressor's comments, he did not single out any individual poster, so that may not be considered flaming in the usual sense, but could possibly considered a "group flaming", which I (obviously) believe is a healthy thing for any community.
Thanks for your response.
Joe
smaryka said:Wake me up when this thread actually gets interesting again...
Hawkwood said:From memory he took over from David Saunders when the latter died in the 1970s. Liggett was quite a good racer and got a domestic pro contract for a short time in the 1960s. he then got involved with the Milk Race, plus understudied Saunders, before taking over from him as main cycling correspondent for the Telegraph. Many of the UK papers barely covered cycling at all, and the Telegraph's coverage was pretty meagre compared with what we get today. I assume Liggett was having to do some dodging and weaving in order to make a living then. Liggett and Sherwin are both from the same neck of the woods, having grown up about 10 miles (in a straight line) from each other.
alberto.legstrong said:[Channeling Rod Serling's voice]
Hawkwood, you just past a signpost that you were going to fast to read. You have just entered, The Circular Zone, where you will be peppered with questions and discredited on any minutiae you get wrong. A world where logic and the overall point becomes malleable, space and time is distorted and the obvious comes into question....
pnwrider said:Betsy--I believe EPO was added to the banned list in 91 or 92. It was fairly early after introduction
alberto.legstrong said:(Sorry about the dust-up over journos. How 'bout I come up with 10 names this weekend - if I have the time? If you have made it to adulthood and can't see how access to celebrity compromises objectivity, I am not sure if I can be much help to you, though!)
Wallace said:Hi Elizabeth,
Since you're here, and since, unlike the most of the posters here, you actually have first-hand knowledge of what goes on in the world of pro cycling, I'd like to ask you a question:
Why on earth does Taylor Phinney ride for RadioShack? His dad has to know the truth about Armstrong and Bruyneel--there's no way Davis can in any way pretend that his son isn't riding for the king of the dopers. If my son was super talented and Armstrong and Co. wanted to hire him, I'd say hell no, and obviously I don't know one tenth of what DP knows. What's going on here?
eleven said:Which clean team would you suggest Taylor ride for?
Agapius said:.........
Dr. Maserati said:Hi Agapius - welcome to the forum -Nostradamus was the latest username of a poster who has been banned over 50 times - its not suprising Betsy did not take their question seriously because at one point that user thought that Betsy should have commited perjury for Lance...
So is perjury serious or not BPC?
perico said:What happened to that Agapius' question?
perico said:What happened to that Agapius' question? I was interested in reading the responses. It something that didn't make any sense to me. Was it not appropriate or why did it disappear? (what exactly did Frankie know and why didn't this come up in the trial?)
