Who, for crying out loud, is keeping up and running this ridiculously ineffective testing system?
On a daily basis, we hear riders spelling out how often they have been/are being tested.
Apparently it's a huge job provider, with testers traveling the world to retrieve out-of-competition urine and blood samples.
Would too many positives mean a loss of jobs?
Recall Landis, Jaksche, Kohl, they've all stressed how ineffective the system is. they've been tested without being caught, despite being maximally doped. In other words, we dispose of major evidence (also from the 90s) of how ineffective the testing is.
Are the riders/teams/teamdoctors really outsmarting the testing system?
Why isn't the UCI trying harder to make the testing more effective (= less testing, more positives)?
Who's keeping up appearances? Is it all a UCI-internal affaire?
Does the WADA have a corrupt wing?
On a daily basis, we hear riders spelling out how often they have been/are being tested.
Apparently it's a huge job provider, with testers traveling the world to retrieve out-of-competition urine and blood samples.
Would too many positives mean a loss of jobs?
Recall Landis, Jaksche, Kohl, they've all stressed how ineffective the system is. they've been tested without being caught, despite being maximally doped. In other words, we dispose of major evidence (also from the 90s) of how ineffective the testing is.
Are the riders/teams/teamdoctors really outsmarting the testing system?
Why isn't the UCI trying harder to make the testing more effective (= less testing, more positives)?
Who's keeping up appearances? Is it all a UCI-internal affaire?
Does the WADA have a corrupt wing?