Hamilton is just another irrelevant doping statistic in professional cycling.
The sport is brutal enough, no one cares where these particular, statistics end up. It suits all, if they are gone and forgotten.
Something to talk & laugh at whilst your pedalling the neutralised zones,
or the first few hours of a classic/stage.
eg, something along these lines "hey you remember that c#nt "x" , saw him last week, he's doing some dead end job, sold his porsche, he's broke" etc....... dumb f@ck. you can make your own examples, but you get the point.
If you think this is a drastic example, then my forum friends, you are naive.
last weeks news, over. next.
In professional cycling, whether you dope or not, is not the issue,
as a rider, it is your individual choice.
You do, or You do not.
To be beaten by a cyclist and having knowledge that you are clean, and he is doped, is something "old school" and remains unspoken.
The crime is not in the use, it is in being caught.
Omerta is everything - shut up,take punishment, finish career.
Talk and you'll be joining the dead end job line. Fast.
Tyler perhaps for personal reasons might be helped by clearing his chest,
though he has nothing to gain by opening his mouth - what little dignity or reputation he has managed to retain, would be slaughtered by the cycling media, the UCI, and any remarks which offered allegations, would be summararily discredited by anyone implicated.
He has no credibility left to point fingers, as much as he might.
for a "DLS" like Pevenage to make comments as he did, or McQuaid's remarks, highlights the area of professional cycling, that needs cleaning up, more than the riders.
To me, that is where the problem perpetuates.
Any confession Tyler may consider (if at all) would be best served for his own reasons, in his own mind, and within his own privacy.
Thats the reality.