BroDeal said:It would be funny if he went bankrupt, hid assets, and went to prison for bankruptcy fraud like Lenny Dykstra.
lol.. Dykstra's legal woes go far deeper than that. He is pure criminal. Not sure if ol' Lance could even match up to him.
BroDeal said:It would be funny if he went bankrupt, hid assets, and went to prison for bankruptcy fraud like Lenny Dykstra.
Bosco10 said:lol.. Dykstra's legal woes go far deeper than that. He is pure criminal. Not sure if ol' Lance could even match up to him.
Bosco10 said:lol.. Dykstra's legal woes go far deeper than that. He is pure criminal. Not sure if ol' Lance could even match up to him.
That's actually an amusing image. Photoshoppers get to work!BroDeal said:Will Armstrong come to grips with trading the Livestrong jet in for a shabbily painted Livestrong VW bus?
That's actually an amusing image. Photoshoppers get to work!BroDeal said:Will Armstrong come to grips with trading the Livestrong jet in for a shabbily painted Livestrong VW bus?
rata de sentina said:That's actually an amusing image. Photoshoppers get to work!
thehog said:More lies...
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/more/news/20130305/lance-armstrong-interview/
Armstrong also said that every top rider doped during the prime of his career and that his doping techniques were unexceptional, if not conservative. He stressed that while he lied more than other riders about doping, he was also asked about doping more than other riders, many of whom, according to Armstrong, were not prominent enough to attract media inquiry.
Although Armstrong faces a bevy of lawsuits -- including a $90 million whistle-blower suit brought by both the U.S. Department of Justice and his archrival Floyd Landis -- he looked fit and did not seem overwhelmed or stressed. He made repeated reference to fighting the lawsuits that threaten his fortune, reportedly worth about $125 million. Of course, it makes sense to show a combative spirit when it comes to litigation. The stronger he portrays himself, the more he hopes the other side will agree to settle the cases. Armstrong's history suggests he is nothing if not strategic (many would say manipulative), so his appearance may not match reality.
Fortyninefourteen said:5hit keps getting realer and realer.....
Mr. McCann it is not hard to see why people have given up on journalists having any sense or credibility. You article is a story about interviewing him, since you were not able to interview him as it was off the record and you were not allowed to quote him.
How sad and pathetic.
thehog said:More lies...
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/more/news/20130305/lance-armstrong-interview/
Armstrong also said that every top rider doped during the prime of his career and that his doping techniques were unexceptional, if not conservative. He stressed that while he lied more than other riders about doping, he was also asked about doping more than other riders, many of whom, according to Armstrong, were not prominent enough to attract media inquiry.
Although Armstrong faces a bevy of lawsuits -- including a $90 million whistle-blower suit brought by both the U.S. Department of Justice and his archrival Floyd Landis -- he looked fit and did not seem overwhelmed or stressed. He made repeated reference to fighting the lawsuits that threaten his fortune, reportedly worth about $125 million. Of course, it makes sense to show a combative spirit when it comes to litigation. The stronger he portrays himself, the more he hopes the other side will agree to settle the cases. Armstrong's history suggests he is nothing if not strategic (many would say manipulative), so his appearance may not match reality.
thehog said:
Much of the interview was off the record, and when Armstrong went on the record he didn't want to be quoted, but was OK with being paraphrased.
There were no limits on what I could ask.![]()
thehog said:More lies...
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/more/news/20130305/lance-armstrong-interview/
Armstrong also said that every top rider doped during the prime of his career and that his doping techniques were unexceptional, if not conservative. He stressed that while he lied more than other riders about doping, he was also asked about doping more than other riders, many of whom, according to Armstrong, were not prominent enough to attract media inquiry.
Although Armstrong faces a bevy of lawsuits -- including a $90 million whistle-blower suit brought by both the U.S. Department of Justice and his archrival Floyd Landis -- he looked fit and did not seem overwhelmed or stressed. He made repeated reference to fighting the lawsuits that threaten his fortune, reportedly worth about $125 million. Of course, it makes sense to show a combative spirit when it comes to litigation. The stronger he portrays himself, the more he hopes the other side will agree to settle the cases. Armstrong's history suggests he is nothing if not strategic (many would say manipulative), so his appearance may not match reality.
To be fair though, the same could be said for Johan, Stapleton and Knaggs.ChewbaccaD said:Seriously, that guy is d0uchebag doping for sure.
Granville57 said:Wondering how long it takes before some "journalist" just tells Lance to f'ck off, and that they have better things to do than "interview" him.
As the comments point out, WTF does this even mean?!
Of course, we've heard this one before:
I have a question!
Hey Lance, we're Betsy and Frankie telling the truth about the hospital room?
![]()
thehog said:Love one of the comments:
thehog said:More lies...
Armstrong also said that every top rider doped during the prime of his career and that his doping techniques were unexceptional, if not conservative.
Race Radio said:What nonsense.
What about the riders who said no and were pushed from the sport? Everyone did transfusions? Really?
Have to admit, the "Sponsers made me sue people" is an original defense
mewmewmew13 said:It's all he's got left.
Sinking fast....
Race Radio said:What nonsense.
What about the riders who said no and were pushed from the sport? Everyone did transfusions? Really?
Have to admit, the "Sponsers made me sue people" is an original defense
MarkvW said:Lance Armstrong: Conservative Doper! That's pretty funny. Maybe he's hoping for some residual Republican support!
BillytheKid said:The problem is that we are all capable liers at times. Where doping and actual talent collide? Luck of the draw and only so many slots. Zero-sum game. The sponsors are investors, and they expect a return. Has SCA ever said how much money they made during the glory days?
To me Armstrong is still the mix-up kid that had the same drive that all great competitors have except he had no bearing to ever be satisfied. Lust or greed mixed with profit minded science and a boiling anger at the world?
Adam and Eve ate from the tree of knowlegde of good and evil
Original sin. What a concept. And now those who have detroned Sir Lance do the same. It's never enough. That's how the push always comes down.
A fixed roof will in time leak again. Still, I admit, we must fix it as best we can.
BillytheKid said:Has SCA ever said how much money they made during the glory days?
