thehog said:
Valv.Piti said:
And what exactly does that tell you? It may have cost him between 5-10 seconds, but it is quite obvious that Landa had to take way more risks than Valverde and Nibali and did so.
Why did he have to take more risks? That doesn't make any sense. Nibali has always been a devil descender in the wet.
Well, because Landa is at a relatively big disadvantage compared to those 2. He got a semi-hilly ITT in huge showers, couldn't really have been better conditions for him.
If you actually watched the ITT, it was quite obvious that Valverde and Nibali took it rather slow. Im pretty sure the times also indicate that Mikel gained a significant amount of time on the downhill parts. I don't have them right now
Anyways, I get the point of having this thread, but after this ITT? It wasn't out of the ordinary considering the conditions, it was surprising, but nothing more than that IMO. I'll get on the bandwagon when he easily drops the rest on the climbs, but for now, I think you really are reaching on this one ITT