• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

THE INDEPENDENT COMMISSION REPORT #2

Re: Doping In Athletics

thehog said:

Summary:

The report says that the IAAF council could not have been unaware of doping athletics.

*** Pound says Lord Coe is the best person to carry on as the IAAF president and days he doesn’t believe that the former London 2012 chief knew about the doping.

But he does say that there was a cover-up – something Coe denied on Wednesday.

Instead Pound blames organisational failure and says the blame extends beyond the Diacks but continued to absolve Coe of blame.

Of course, the Diacks are not without blame and Pound said that everything began with the former IAAF president Lamine Diack who “was responsible for organizing and enabling the conspiracy and corruption” that took place.

The commission also fears that instances of extortion in Russia and Turkey may be the ‘tip of the iceberg’.

Pound refuses to set a timeframe for Russia’s return to elite athletics competition.

Coe would have to have been enormously unobservant and detached as the Vice-President of an organisation that was involved in such widespread and extensive corruption and not to have had any suspicions about any of it yet that is what the world is being asked to believe! This is not a credible position for him or for anyone else to maintain for very long without making themselves look ridiculous!

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/live/2016/jan/14/athletics-doping-scandal-wada-releases-part-two-of-report-live
 
Jul 11, 2013
3,340
0
0
I struggle to fathom how Coe for all those years not being "aware" of the doping makes him "best man" for the job.

I mean how is he going to "cleanse" T&F if he has zero awareness of what is going on around him.

How on earth is this something that works in his favor?? (rhetorical)

Unless of course you want someone that seemingly wouldn't even notice it if people were injecting themselves right in front of his very eyes.

Sad thing is, that this was a good day for Coe an co.

Unbelievable.
 
Re:

mrhender said:
I struggle to fathom how Coe for all those years not being "aware" of the doping makes him "best man" for the job.

I mean how is he going to "cleanse" T&F if he has zero awareness of what is going on around him.

How on earth is this something that works in his favor?? (rhetorical)

Unless of course you want someone that seemingly wouldn't even notice it if people were injecting themselves right in front of his very eyes.

Sad thing is, that this was a good day for Coe an co.

Unbelievable.

Money always talks, it wont get any better, it never will.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Re:

Cake said:
https://twitter.com/RAnneShirley
Does anyone know what Renee Anne Shirley is referring to here? What is IF?
IF i think is International Federation. The WADA code doesn't allow personal info on athletes to be leaked by any IF. So she correctly infers IAAF, being an IF, has broken the WADA code.

RAnneShirley is a great twitter account, she knows what time it is, thoug a bit of a voice crying in the desert atm.
 
Jul 5, 2012
85
0
0
So where was the 'wow' factor in this report? Has it been toned down? Some sections removed or something? Sounds like the powers that be have some kind a pact to me.
 
Jun 21, 2015
377
0
4,280
Nov 25th 2015

*** Pound says second part of Wada doping report will be more explosive

*** Pound, author of the report that revealed shocking levels of doping in Russian athletics and led to the suspension of Russia’s athletics federation, says the second part of the document will be even more explosive.

Pound said the next round of the World Anti-Doping Agency report that looks into possible corruption within the International Association of Athletics Federations will be even more jolting.

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/nov/25/***-pound-wada-report-explosive-wow-factor-iaaf
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
I think FreddytheFrog and Benotti nailed it upthread alluding to a possible threesome Reedie, Pound and Coe, the latter equipped with a nice brown Nike envelope.

Reedie "was a leading member of the London 2012 Bid Team which won the right to host the Olympic Games in London and is a Non-Executive Director of the London Organising Committee. Furthermore, he became a Board member of the Olympic Lottery Distributor in 2006." https://www.wada-ama.org/en/sir-craig-reedies-biography
who again was the chairman of that committee? :rolleyes:
nothing to see here.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Sir-Craig-Reedie-008.jpg


http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2012/jul/26/london-2012-sir-craig-reedie-ioc
 
Re:

mrhender said:
I struggle to fathom how Coe for all those years not being "aware" of the doping makes him "best man" for the job.

I mean how is he going to "cleanse" T&F if he has zero awareness of what is going on around him.

How on earth is this something that works in his favor?? (rhetorical)

Unless of course you want someone that seemingly wouldn't even notice it if people were injecting themselves right in front of his very eyes.

Sad thing is, that this was a good day for Coe an co.

Unbelievable.
Coe is either incredibly corrupt or incredibly incompetent. In either case he should be booted out immediately.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Re: Re:

frenchfry said:
mrhender said:
I struggle to fathom how Coe for all those years not being "aware" of the doping makes him "best man" for the job.

I mean how is he going to "cleanse" T&F if he has zero awareness of what is going on around him.

How on earth is this something that works in his favor?? (rhetorical)

Unless of course you want someone that seemingly wouldn't even notice it if people were injecting themselves right in front of his very eyes.

Sad thing is, that this was a good day for Coe an co.

Unbelievable.
Coe is either incredibly corrupt or incredibly incompetent. In either case he should be booted out immediately.
booted out by whom though?
I'm afraid like with FIFA we're going to have to wait until the FBI get involved.
The Pound report was effectively an in-house operation.
 
Re: Re:

frenchfry said:
mrhender said:
I struggle to fathom how Coe for all those years not being "aware" of the doping makes him "best man" for the job.

I mean how is he going to "cleanse" T&F if he has zero awareness of what is going on around him.

How on earth is this something that works in his favor?? (rhetorical)

Unless of course you want someone that seemingly wouldn't even notice it if people were injecting themselves right in front of his very eyes.

Sad thing is, that this was a good day for Coe an co.

Unbelievable.
Coe is either incredibly corrupt or incredibly incompetent. In either case he should be booted out immediately.

The problem they have is no sporting administration could ever clean up doping or try to. There is an entire organized crime syndicate behind distributing PEDS. That doesn't disappear overnight. Russian gangsters don't give up because WADA said so. The only way to deal with it, is to manage it the best way possible and that is to have Coe involved as he understands what goes on. You couldn't possible have anyone else who thought they could actually make a difference.

Other Feds are happy as their doping might now stand a chance. So they are happy Russia is a little more contained than normal. Swings and Roundabouts.
 
Perhaps not with quite the same reasoning, I agree that Coe remaining in place... with everyone watching closely...is probably the best option. My reasoning is in the Athletics thread.... maybe mods want to shift a few more posts over here.
 
Jul 11, 2013
3,340
0
0
Re:

armchairclimber said:
Perhaps not with quite the same reasoning, I agree that Coe remaining in place... with everyone watching closely...is probably the best option. My reasoning is in the Athletics thread.... maybe mods want to shift a few more posts over here.

Since the IC report volume 2 came out there have been most reaction in the other thread.
It seemed to work well with independent commision report #1 thread. But right now it seems the same things are being discussed simultaneously here and in the doping in athletics thread.

Maybe it is not such a good idea woth two threads at the moment.

It can also be hard to seperate the two threads unless you are abiding to strct criterias perhaps restraining discussion.

I'am undecided and will happily take input from posters here.