The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Wait, was she behind the Peloton or at the back of it?Another week, another time the UCI show they are incapable of running the show. In this case by acting as emotionless robots.
Lucinda Brand stopped for her fallen colleague (Elisa Balsamo) because she saw it was really bad, and it was only a couple meters before the finish. The UCI decided to not give her the same time as the peloton, but losing 3min.
Sanguineti was part of the peloton and rode back before riding over the line. You can see it in this video, you can see someone turning back, that's Sanguineti. I'm not sure where Brand was herself.Wait, was she behind the Peloton or at the back of it?
It’s a bad precedent to start allowing riders to stop whenever a teammate is down but in this case it seems a bit petty especially if Balsamo is s.t.Sanguineti was part of the peloton and rode back before riding over the line. You can see it in this video, you can see someone turning back, that's Sanguineti. I'm not sure where Brand was herself.
Point is more that Balsamo crashed hard, and her time is the same as the peloton. But people stopping to help her that were also part of the peloton are punished. I find it weird, and a typical UCI move to not see this the same as a crash.
We’re the riders who stopped actively rescuing Balsamo or just there for emotional support?Duty to rescue - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Are you insinuating they should be able to assess the situation while riding their bikes at 60kph from a distance, whether they might be able to help, or whether it would just be for moral support they would stop? You see a person laying on the ground, hurt. You stop and see whether you can help.We’re the riders who stopped actively rescuing Balsamo or just there for emotional support?
For ex the Itzulia crash when Tratnik or whoever it was from Visma stopped to help, that made perfect sense. Same thing if you saw Mader go over the cliff. But here it looks like a sprint finish a few meters from the line, certainly there are already medical staff and others on site. I see her standing there giving a hug to someone in the pic so by that point it’s clearly not about assessing the situation. Not trying to be rude, I get her reaction, but cyclists have to ride by crashed teammates all the time.Are you insinuating they should be able to assess the situation while riding their bikes at 60kph from a distance, whether they might be able to help, or whether it would just be for moral support they would stop? You see a person laying on the ground, hurt. You stop and see whether you can help.
And again, you can not assess that from a distance at speed. In Poland, Jakobsen crashed ON the actual line. Still it was his teammate Senechal who was first to help, and later was believed to have saved his life.For ex the Itzulia crash when Tratnik or whoever it was from Visma stopped to help, that made perfect sense. Same thing if you saw Mader go over the cliff. But here it looks like a sprint finish a few meters from the line, certainly there are already medical staff and others on site. I see her standing there giving a hug to someone in the pic so by that point it’s clearly not about assessing the situation. Not trying to be rude, I get her reaction, but cyclists have to ride by crashed teammates all the time.
I think Milan made the right decision in Rome in order to contest the sprint, despite risking a DSQ.As a rider you should never get yourself into a position where you could possibly be disqualified. Stupid in the extreme.
As a rider you should never get yourself into a position where you could possibly be disqualified. Stupid in the extreme.
As a rider you should never get yourself into a position where you could possibly be disqualified. Stupid in the extreme.
Shielded an abuser ... sounds familiar ... mmm.... human rights activist Shannon Galpin, who had helped to found the first women's cycling team in Afghanistan and who was also facilitating evacuations, learned that Fazli was threatening to suspend the licenses of riders who questioned his selection of athletes to evacuate.
"They ignored cyclists and whistleblowers and shielded a known abuser."
Looking at this, now I actually don't see why he couldn't have been allowed to start, if UCI realised they'd made a mistake.
Sure, if he'd been pulled off his bike - well, told to get off his bike - halfway through the stage, he of course couldn't have been allowed to start the next day. However, as I read it, he only got the DSQ after the finish line, so what would have prevented the UCI from letting him start?
Will be interesting, there six other very strong candidates, I suspect lobbying and politics will play a big part. Certainly not a given. Coe is possibly the guy with with the best CV, but age perhaps is against him.All you need to know about Lappi and his Olympic dreams -
https://velo.outsideonline.com/news...stoppable-rise-of-the-ucis-david-lappartient/
Too young you mean 😉Will be interesting, there six other very strong candidates, I suspect lobbying and politics will play a big part. Certainly not a given. Coe is possibly the guy with with the best CV, but age perhaps is against him.
Well he is the oldest of the candidates, and would be the oldest to take on the role since 1952, so no, I don't think he does mean too young.Too young you mean 😉