online-rider said:Really?, i dont remember any.
But this case was more for promotion than for an aero concept.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
online-rider said:Really?, i dont remember any.
LaFlorecita said:I HATE them. They're fugly.
WillemS said:People don't like change; you'll get used to them. I actually don't mind them that much, the helmets are not that ugly to look at. If there is no better reason to ban them than that narrow, conservative thing called taste, then I would not ban them. Opinions change.
About the increase in performance, all little bits help. Alone, most of the innovations in gear do not add that much efficiency, but taken together they can make that noticeable difference you're looking for.
Martin318is said:On the track the ventlesss helmet is a bit of an aero thing but the reason that the covers were created for helmets on the road is weather - not aero. Given how much heat the body loses through the top of the head, covering the vents on the sub 5C or seriously rainy days makes sense. Lots of riders in colder areas used to do things like hats or plastic bags under the helmet. Its only later that people got on the aero advantage idea about them.
If you were a rider and wearing one of those covers solely for aero effect, wouldn't you want it to be completly smooth rather than following the pattern of the vents underneath?
That said, they are ugly but not as bad as skinsuits in road races.
Nikoloz said:cycling was better without helmets...
Libertine Seguros said:Maybe Flecha's just a better bike rider than them.
hatcher said:Did you not see his sprint?
Personally I struggle to find any helmet attractive to look at. They're all ugly as sin.
Fatclimber said:Geez, who cares. If you don't like those, how do you feel about tt helmets? Anyway there's a distinct purpose for them. They probably save three billionths of a watt. That amounts to the width of a derailleur cable strand over 250k. What would you say if your favorite rider lost by that much?
Magnus said:New helmets are old news:
http://www.bikerumor.com/2010/04/04/team-katusha-tests-new-helmet-covers-at-flanders/
And didn't they have helmet covers in the early 90'ies late 80'ies?
Wraith Rider said:Yes, but that was before the lightweight plastic shell was introduced to keep the beer cooler foam from shattering in a dozen pieces. Once they figured that out, covers were a thing of the past.
dolophonic said:They do look a bit OTT. Wearing one with a cap underneath is overkill.
Just a way to get people to spend their $
Angliru said:They still sell goretex helmet covers. I don't recall seeing the pro's wear them but Louis Garneau and Gore do sell them.
Winterfold said:I wonder why Cav is not getting picked up for his black shorts? I find it hard to believe UCI would exercise discretion on grounds of taste, but maybe there is hope?
For those who didn't see it:FignonLeGrand said:As a brit I was shocked to see the horror of Wiggins national champ helmet in today's Paris Nice stage. Bloody horrific.