"A senior Australian cycling figure"... Let's see if this one's credentials qualify him...
Here's what Martin Vinnicombe's ex manager, major cycling event organizer, life member of Cycling NSW, executive member of NSW Cycling and a Board member of Cycling Australia, and now on the UCI arbitration panel, had to say about USADA recently (27 Aug):
"Sydney's Phil Bates, a member of the international cycling union's arbitration tribunal, yesterday described USADA's actions against Armstrong as unenforceable and described the organisation's chief executive Travis Tygart as an "egomaniac publicity hunter".
...
"If USADA believes Armstrong has a case to answer, the ultimate judge should be the UCI, not a publicity-seeking chief executive hellbent on a witch-hunt to chop down the tallest poppy in our sport."
Bates said the rules relating to what powers a doping agency has were quite clear. "USADA, or any other national anti-doping agency for that matter, is there to test for illicit drugs, nothing more, nothing less," he said. "It has no legal right to strip an athlete of his race wins, Olympic medals or prizemoney.
"People will make up their own minds about Armstrong after he stopped his legal battle, but from where I sit Tygart's actions should be seen as nothing more than a witch-hunt.
"Everything I've read of the USADA case has been driven by Tygart and against Armstrong built on hearsay evidence provided by a small group of riders who rode with him more than 12 years ago, and some of whom are still competing today."