If he reduces the bullsh*t quotient, then, even in a negative way, he has done the site some service...
Think on this, Hog. think how long defenders of Armstrong were able to say, with no hint of a lie, that everyone else was at it, that the peleton was corrupt top to bottom, and therefore it didn't really matter - the 'level playing field' fallacy.
How much longer did it take to pin down LA because we all took the attitude, sure, everyone dopes?
Armstrong was certainly not finally nailed by rumour, or by 'implications', or by join the dots - he was nailed by good old fashioned evidence. If we had relied on the nudge, nudge, wink, wink of the Clinic, he's still be a TdF legend.
We require evidence, facts, concrete detail. all the guessing, alluding and snarking is just a waste of everyone's breath.
If you have info, actual info on Sky or its personnel, Or Berti, Or Aussies, cough it up. In detail. With names, and evidence.
Otherwise it's just so much narcissim.