The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Ah so your comment makes you far right. Congratulations on qualifying. Your folks must be proud. Tell us the lovely far right characteristics you hold? I'm waiting with baited breath. This is so excitingPathetic, the things he has said against male cyclists compared to woman. Only a far left looney would support this
💩Haha, fair point.
But honestly, sanctioning someone for an opinion, no matter how stupid, would have never been something I expected...
Seems if it gets to the level of defamation there's a legal system for that, but I may be projecting my American view of the law onto this.
The word contemporaneity does not belong to contemporaneityIt's a divisionary tactic to demostrate they're putting up the good fight in these times. Pat's an easy target, not belonging to contemporaneity.
Erm uci have their own governance, so not specific to one country's laws......It's 2024 and people still don't know what free speech laws actually mean.
Anyway, what's lamer to me is that the articles don't refer to the exact quote.
Addiotionally, I'm more interested in what Bashenko actually did.
100%It's a divisionary tactic to demostrate they're putting up the good fight in these times. Pat's an easy target, not belonging to contemporaneity.
Really? Link to evidence please?
Maybe you could expand on that comment.
Patrick Lefevere’s comments might be controversial, but they don’t necessarily mean hate speech.I'm siding with Patrick. You can call it a weird comparison or an unlucky choice of words, but it isn't hate speech. Doesn't the UCI have anything more serious to occupy itself with, like measuring socks or something?
Well, that's because, Pat has the proverbial and self-professed cojones. The others are just lilly-livered ***.Pat's an easy target only because he makes himself one.
Somehow the rest of the old codgers in cycling seem to manage just fine with their public statements even in 2024.
The whole charade is ridiculous and appalling.I'm siding with Patrick. You can call it a weird comparison or an unlucky choice of words, but it isn't hate speech. Doesn't the UCI have anything more serious to occupy itself with, like measuring socks or something?
Well, that's because, Pat has the proverbial and self-professed cojones. The others are just lilly-livered ***.
Maybe you could expand on that comment.
But its eyes are smiling, I'm getting mixed signals...It's an excrement (possibly from a dog). It's intended to indicate disagreement in a disrespectful way.
You're welcome.
"I weigh my words, but they were seriously inadequate." "Let me be honest: how we pulled away as a team was just painful," Lefevere continues glumly. "I saw us leading around 90 kilometres from the finish, but after that: the big nothing. We don't even participate in the group behind Mathieu van der Poel and Wout van Aert. Lidl-Trek has three men in the top ten. UAE Team Emirates without Tadej Pogacar is down to two men. And we have nothing."
Noted, thanks for this invaluable piece of information.Today one of Slovenian ski jumping commentators ended his decade long "hobby", commentating ski jumping on national TV. In general he was loved and is considered a legend, but obvisuly a small an vocal minority "finally won". Arguing he is a drunk and nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking.
Noted, thanks for this invaluable piece of information.