And Rogla would have done better before he crashed out of the Tour if he hadn't crashed previously over the season, but that's irrelevant to the discussion of the specific crash that caused him to abandon the race.When somebody crashes out, you have no point of reference of what he could have done. When somebody crashes, but is able to continue, i think it's safe to say there is a reasonable chance he could have done better without the crash. Or you think that's too farfetched?