He won’t be a factor the rest of this season. He’s better off relaxing and focusing on a big goal next year
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Who's we?that’s why Jorgensen handed remco his ass in P-N and we all thought remco was washed up as a GC rider
I speak for everyone hereWho's we?
You were pushing the same theory this winter when VdP was winning crosses left and right, saying he would not have achieved anything in the classics.He’s a single peak rider
I ate my hat then. But mvp is a 5 month plateau rider with one or two peaks. He has not been impressive since AprilYou were pushing the same theory this winter when VdP was winning crosses left and right, saying he would not have achieved anything in the classics.
Euro champs don't really clash hard with anything? It's kinda can be yolo'd into the schedule whenever.Maybe on the limit?
But I cant see why he wouldn't compete on a route which suits him when it fits his calender, but then again, that could be never really.
Yes, your last sentence was exactly what I was thinking about. Almost every Worlds parcours really makes sense for Remco to target, and he will be doing the Tour for a while now. Even freaking Copenhagen he could win.Euro champs don't really clash hard with anything? It's kinda can be yolo'd into the schedule whenever.
Though maybe it's too late after the Tour to throw in if you wanna do Tour and then focus on the Worlds if it's in the mid August slot.
Copenhagen? Nah. It's just way too easy and gets full sprint trains at the end.Yes, your last sentence was exactly what I was thinking about. Almost every Worlds parcours really makes sense for Remco to target, and he will be doing the Tour for a while now. Even freaking Copenhagen he could win.
I guess my point is that on 90% of the routes Remco will have a decent shot to a very, very good chance of winning in top shappe.Copenhagen? Nah. It's just way too easy and gets full sprint trains at the end.
Super hard parcourses on the other hand are probably just automatic Pogacar wins
Why do you guys do this to yourself? He's resurrected his legend with a podium in the tour and Olympics. You go and knock down his legend expecting such things.Next peak this year is WC.
Just because you peak doesn’t automatically mean you will win. No one is saying he’ll win by default.Why do you guys do this to yourself? He's resurrected his legend with a podium in the tour and Olympics. You go and knock down his legend expecting such things.
This is how he is: a real championship rider. He wants to defend his WC ITT title. Both the ITT route and RR route suits him very well. After a short break he will go on altitude camp, followed by brittain or renewi tour and ecc itt.Why do you guys do this to yourself? He's resurrected his legend with a podium in the tour and Olympics. You go and knock down his legend expecting such things.
Of course you sponsor benefits from having a riders whose fame just increased dramatically, and who now will be called "...the [x]-time Olympic champion" for the rest of his career."There are always two in the team who cheer right away: Geert Coeman and I but then we always immediately think: how much is that going to cost?" Lefevere said, referring to Soudal-QuickStep's CFO.
"People think I'm a monkey in that respect, but they don't have to pay him. How much? It is more than enough. That is still a legacy from three years ago when Mr Ralph Denk put a proposal on the table."
"He earned it. Although it remains a shame that our sponsors get little to no benefit from it," Lefevered added, highlighting the limited publicity a team or sponsor can develop from Olympic success due to the International Olympic Committee's strict protection of its branding.
"That photo under the Eiffel Tower is really beautiful. It will probably get a place in my office somewhere."
Unless you've seen metrics that prove otherwise, I'd say he's a lot closer to the truth than you might realize.I've never been overly bothered by Lefevre, but this stuff... I mean dude. Just shut up for a minute. It's definitely NOT about you.
Of course you sponsor benefits from having a riders whose fame just increased dramatically, and who now will be called "...the [x]-time Olympic champion" for the rest of his career.
Maybe give it a couple weeks before you start in about how all this affects YOU.
Complete muppet.
I think I realize the situation pretty well. There's not zero value in it. I also get his point, I just don't care right now.Unless you've seen metrics that prove otherwise, I'd say he's a lot closer to the truth than you might realize.
Lefevre is loss-splaining. He knows he’s about to lose remco. Can hope for a buyout
"If someone says tomorrow: 'This is annual salary, we will double that and add a little bit more', then I might be able to accept it," Het Nieuwsblad reported him as saying.
The team and rider almost always have media exposure incentives that benefit them for this kind of success. He's always been pre-emptive (usually in the negative sense) to change in expected performance. It comes off as bush league with Remco's PR windfall at this Olympics. Patrick can only milk that success so long but the rider's estimate of the value of two Golds may be much higher. I don't know why I even stated it as "may be"; they most certainly do. Simone Biles will make more than $7m in endorsement income. That sounds stellar to a cyclist until they find out NBA pros, golfers and tennis folks playing in the Olympics earn $100m (+) on up in addition to their actual sporting contracts for team players.Unless you've seen metrics that prove otherwise, I'd say he's a lot closer to the truth than you might realize.