Who else do you suggest will be the guy to test him? Skjelmose? Powless? Vlasov? Pidcock? Honest question.
He got sucked into following Alaphilippe... sure if he really thought Alaphilippe was a threat, but he could just as easily have waited for the peloton. I mean, assuming he is not intellectually challenged, why should he decide to power on after Alaphilippe got dropped (something everybody vaguely familiar with the current state of the peloton could see coming a mile away and something he must have realised that very instance) when he saw nobody was coming and he didn't feel he had the legs? Pride? Arrogance? There is no rule against getting caught on purpose if you think that's your best road to victory. But he did it during Worlds, he did it in Strade, he did it in Lombardia, he tried it in MSR... So he didn't really get "sucked" into it, he simply did what he always does. He got triggered in the moment, but had Alaphilippe not accelerated, how long would Pogacar otherwise have waited? Ten seconds? Five kilometers? Have you known Pogacar to "hope" somebody to come up, like, ever? Maybe it has happened but i can't think of an instance, at least not in a 1 day race lately.
Either he overestimated himself or he underestimated the opposition. Same difference. Maybe because Evenepoel was no match during the WCC and Lombardia, assuming he was beating a top Evenepoel then, which he wasn't. Who knows. But Evenepoel is still a former world champ and the current Olympic champ, the best rouleur and TT'er in the world on flat roads. So why would you act so condescending towards Evenepoel as a rival? I honestly don't get it. You still actually think Evenepoel is just another one like Pidcock, Healy or Hirschi? It boggles my mind.