Haven't seen those discussions, and nor have I seen Pogi's weight being used as an excuse when he doesn't win.Good thing Pogacar’s weight has never been discussed in relation to Roubaix, or MVDP’s for LBL or Lombardia…
Haven't seen those discussions, and nor have I seen Pogi's weight being used as an excuse when he doesn't win.Good thing Pogacar’s weight has never been discussed in relation to Roubaix, or MVDP’s for LBL or Lombardia…
Firstly, being at the right weight is no gaurantee for success. Secondly, not being at the right weight, in this case too heavy, likely results in failure. Neither is an excuse, but an unavoidable truth.His weight is ready for an excuse when he doesn't win.
Pog has NEVER done a successful long ITT. He trained last year at the worlds and still was absolutely mauled. Gap ballooned in the final 10km.
Pog is not Pantani at the ITT. He's more akin to Contador. One of the best TTers overall but rather inconsistent
Neither was an issue, so why discuss it, right?Good thing Pogacar’s weight has never been discussed in relation to Roubaix, or MVDP’s for LBL or Lombardia…
It's used as an excuse when he doesn't win. Haven't seen that for any other rider.Firstly, being at the right weight is no gaurantee for success. Secondly, not being at the right weight, in this case too heavy, likely results in failure. Neither is an excuse, but an unavoidable truth.
Let's say Remco is able to keep up with Pogi in the mountains, which entirely remains to be seen, mind you, a long TT of 50 km could be decisive. In any case, with this generation long ITTs should really come back, as in two 50 km ones, not the ridiculously short ones of late.I agree to a point - but in a GT recovery plays a major role. In a pancake flat TT of 50km on stage 20 I would be convinced Pog would be closer to Remco than the exact same TT on stage 5 or 6 etc,
Likewise if stage 20 of the Tour 2024 was a one day TT Remco probably wins.regardless of climbing - the reality is Pog's.recovery would mitigate the size of the gap in all probability.
In.general though I like.you would.prefer GTs to have.longer TTs.
It was never an excuse, that's just how you eroneously see it to suite your anti-Remco narrative. That much is patently clear.It's used as an excuse when he doesn't win. Haven't seen that for any other rider.
It's an excuse and it doesn't suits your narrative.It was never an excuse, that's just how you eroneously see it to suite your anti-Remco narrative. That much is patently clear.
Of course if he keeps up in the mountains he wins. But that also means he is the strongest rider in the race.Let's say Remco is able to keep up with Pogi in the mountains, which entirely remains to be seen, mind you, the a long TT of 50 km could be decisive. In any case, with this generation long ITTs should really come back, as in two 50 km ones, not the ridiculously short ones of late.
I agree to a point - but in a GT recovery plays a major role. In a pancake flat TT of 50km on stage 20 I would be convinced Pog would be closer to Remco than the exact same TT on stage 5 or 6 etc,
Likewise if stage 20 of the Tour 2024 was a one day TT Remco probably wins.regardless of climbing - the reality is Pog's.recovery would mitigate the size of the gap in all probability.
In.general though I like.you would.prefer GTs to have.longer TTs.
If we add 3 mountain stages +200km with at least 3-4 mountains per stage, and 3 MTF stages.I'd like to get back to a prologue, early long TTT (~75km) and ITT (~65km), followed by the stage 19 long ITT (~60km) where recovery really comes into play
If the best climber does not win, tell that climber to ride his TT bike some more so he does not lose so much time
Just because you say such nonsense, does not make it true. It's incredible to what lengths some can go just to be contrary and negative.It's an excuse and it doesn't suits your narrative.
By the way
World's ITT 2025, Pogi wasn't at his semi-mountain ITT weight.
P-R, Pogi wasn't at his cobbles weight
RVB, Mathieu wasn't at his semi-hilly-cobbles weight.
On the contrary...some are negative when the truth doesn't fit their narrative.Just because you say such nonsense, does not make it true. It's incredible to what lengths some can go just to be contrary and negative.
Au contraire, mon frère, the onus is on you who only speaks willful provision of untrue information.On the contrary...some are negative when the truth doesn't fit their narrative.
The weight is on you.
Pog has NEVER done a successful long ITT. He trained last year at the worlds and still was absolutely mauled. Gap ballooned in the final 10km.
Pog is not Pantani at the ITT. He's more akin to Contador. One of the best TTers overall but rather inconsistent
That's what you are doing.Au contraire, mon frère, the onus is on you who only speaks willful provision of untrue information.
The idea of a 75km TTT is hideous. Don’t mind the other ideas. A prologue can calm the nerves of the whole peloton and reduce the week 1 crashes by setting some small GC gaps.I'd like to get back to a prologue, early long TTT (~75km) and ITT (~65km), followed by the stage 19 long ITT (~60km) where recovery really comes into play
If the best climber does not win, tell that climber to ride his TT bike some more so he does not lose so much time
Sayeth the one who trolls this thread.That's what you are doing.
You are a troll bot.Sayeth the one who trolls this thread.
