I could have named plenty of riders as I said.Armstrong is pretty unique since his career is literally split in 2 parts.
Overall career palmares include big one day races and 7 Tours (okay no t really, but..) whereas if you look in detail you'll see the specialisation.
Yes, thanks for bringing Valverde, why didn't you include Roglic as well? Or perhaps Cunego or Bugno?
They just prove it's very hard to win MULTIPLE monuments and GTs.
Heck, even Armstrong didn't win multiple.
he tried to follow the best because he has that mentality always. He never attacked.NO excuse for today
If he was feeling bad, why did he try and attack?
Not that it was immense pressure here, but there were sure a lot of people looking for how his performance was gonna be here today. It was the first real big test this season.I also think Remco has a mentality issue when things don't go his way, which will prevent him from ever winning the Tour, or example, the Vuelta 23, ect.
Destroyed? Please...Remco has been completely destroyed in I don’t know how many latest Monuments he’s participated in, races that perfectly suit his characteristics, yet somehow we’re almost guaranteeing he can win all five Monuments?
Hell, even Pogacar might fall short in two out of five. This discussion feels like a parallel reality.
I could have named plenty of riders as I said.
Of course it is SUPERDUPER hard. But generational talents still do it, and did it in the past, even though some GC riders never seems to care - and this created the false impression that there was some big difference between one day riders and GT GC riders. Which I don't believe. Nor do I believe that doing PR or RVV hinders riders chances at winning the Tour. Which is very difficult of course.
This.I also think Remco has a mentality issue when things don't go his way, which will prevent him from ever winning the Tour, or example, the Vuelta 23, ect.
He has more talent as a rider, but I wouldn’t say he’s a more talented climber than Froome or Nibali, and that’s not even mentioning Bertie.No, but seriously. Pog and JV can have problems like everyone else while RE gets a clean run at things for once. I mean, look at the five year perspective. Remco is more likely to win the Tour before he retires than not, imo. He has 10x the talent of Bernal, Thomas, Froome, Nibali, Evans, Wiggins, Sastre, Pereiro Sio and so on.
Not anymorePerhaps not compared to Froome. I'll concede that. For the rest though? Is Geraint Thomas better than Evenepoel??
There are maybe 7 riders that i can think of that have won multiple Grand Tours and Multiple Monuments in the history of cyclingI could have named plenty of riders as I said.
Of course it is SUPERDUPER hard. But generational talents still do it, and did it in the past, even though some GC riders never seems to care - and this created the false impression that there was some big difference between one day riders and GT GC riders. Which I don't believe. Nor do I believe that doing PR or RVV hinders riders chances at winning the Tour. Which is very difficult of course.
Definitely NOT as a GC rider. His GC results are far below most of those riders and his GC Palmares is very bare - one Vuelta and has never won any of the big seven one week racesMaybe not as a GT GC rider.
also romingerThere are maybe 7 riders that i can think of that have won multiple Grand Tours and Multiple Monuments in the history of cycling
Merckx
Hinault
Bartali
Coppi
Binda
Nibali
Pogacar
I think that is it
Only Merckx, Hinault and Pogacar have even started all of the Monuments and Hinault only rode De ronde once. If Pogacar starts Roubaix this year it will only be Pogacar and Merckx starting all the monuments more than once and winning Multiple Grand tours and Monuments
This is incredibly rare
What is your basis for saying this? Saying 10 times the talent is highly disrespectful to all of these ridersNo, but seriously. Pog and JV can have problems like everyone else while RE gets a clean run at things for once. I mean, look at the five year perspective. Remco is more likely to win the Tour before he retires than not, imo. He has 10x the talent of Bernal, Thomas, Froome, Nibali, Evans, Wiggins, Sastre, Pereiro Sio and so on.
Even the worst pro cyclist does not have less than 10 times remco his talent methinks.What is your basis for saying this? Saying 10 times the talent is highly disrespectful to all of these riders
Truealso rominger
I use hyperbole - it should not be taken literally. But my point being at 19 he was literally world class across TT and Hilly one day races. He was arguably better than all of them already then at some disciplines. Maybe Bernal can claim almost the same promise for climbing.What is your basis for saying this? Saying 10 times the talent is highly disrespectful to all of these riders
Remco has had a lot of set-backs thoughI use hyperbole - it should not be taken literally. But my point being at 19 he was literally world class across TT and Hilly one day races. He was arguably better than all of them already then at some disciplines. Maybe Bernal can claim almost the same promise for climbing.
The old Roglic, yes, but the current one? Emilia is the race that suits Roglic best., and he didn't even see Del Toro's wheel.Waffles and Pommes Frites is a Belgium act of genius. Remco looked like a waffle with pommes frites legs today.
Cooked crispy in the sun. No red bull is making him fly. Roglic would have stayed on toros wheel, no problem.
Regretting after riding just 3 weeks for them with 6 wins? Any program they have in mind to improve his climbing cannot have a material impact at the momenr.Red Bull might be regretting the money they spent on Remco, when they already had a better GC rider in Lopwiz.... Other than the 2024 Tour, Remco's climbing performances and GC results against the big boys is pretty poor.
His mind is always willing to go but he his legs unfortunately not.he tried to follow the best because he has that mentality always. He never attacked.
