Well, not exactly. Some bigger talents (Pogacar), doesn't have one third, or a quarter of hype and scrutiny as Remco has. I think it's the result of incredible hype that his fellow countrymen and fans created.
Maybe that could have something to do with the fact that Slovenia isn't a cycling country? That there is a lot less information about Pogacar to begin with, simply because it's not nearly as interesting for Slovenian media to report about him? That within the cycling world, Slovenian isn't spoken by anybody but Slovenians and that there are a lot less Slovenians on the forum. If Pogacar were a Dutch guy, his topic would probably be twice the size of Evenepoel's.
And yet i don't see how any of that is relevant. Because people want to discuss one rider, cheer for him, praise him for his achievements, how does that stop other people from praising another rider? How is Pogacar's hype or lack thereof, relevant? How is the fact that (more) people talk about Evenepoel more than another rider, triggering people to hate or troll? As if the fact that his thread is longer, somehow invalidates his achievements. Are people that insecure? Are people that jealous? If you browse through this topic, you could list dozens of people who seem to be personally offended, by people praising the achievements of a rider, discussing his strengths and potential. And the funny thing is, these are the people who want to convince people that it's those other people who are emotionally invested. Well i think you need to be invested a lot more emotionally, to hate, dis, tear down a rider, or be offended by the praise he receives by other people, than you need to be in order to praise or discuss a rider in a positive way.