Remco can do the triple giro/tour/vuelta. He can gain 8/10 min in ITT to vingegaard and pogacar
If Vinge and Pogi decide to dress like that then who knows:
![]()
sivakov on remco what?
I think the issue was that it is in French, which not everyone knows well enough to understand, if anything, what he said.click on it. It’s a link to a short interview of sivakov where he is asked which one rider in the peloton impresses him the most…
I think the issue was that it is in French, which not everyone knows well enough to understand, if anything, what he said.
No problem, yes that was the sense I got, although my French isn't good enough to have picked up everything. So thanks.tx for clarifying!
and apologies to @BigCoward
He is asked to pick one pro that impresses him the most. And he says Remco. He says that Remco was on a completely different level than everyone else at San Sebastian (and first week of Vuelta). He said he felt kind of like he had won himself when he finished second. (Oddly that’s what lots of riders used to say during the Merckx era.) He says that while Pog and Vingo are punchier, the thing about Remco is that he just rides you off his wheel and into the ground (literally steamrolls you).
He said Remco > sliced bread > Pogacar/Vingegaard.sivakov on remco what?
He was talking about team strength."I think it's actually easier to win the Tour de France than the Vuelta a España because there's more control by the other team, who watch each other. You only have to follow them and then beat "
You only have to win the relevant stages and then you win GCMr Lefevere is very confident regarding his cyclist and team:
"I think it's actually easier to win the Tour de France than the Vuelta a España because there's more control by the other team, who watch each other. You only have to follow them and then beat "
Giro-Tour double is on the cards for Mr Evenepoel, Pogi & Vinge had better peak for the Vuelta.
And Dumoulin and Froome have never been the same since...both went on a downward trajectory after doing the Giro/TdF double. Why do you guys want to burn riders out?Dumoulin rode a pretty good Giro and Tour in 2018. 2nd in both.
Froome in the same year went 1st and 3rd.
And Dumoulin and Froome have never been the same since...both went on a downward trajectory after doing the Giro/TdF double. Why do you guys want to burn riders out?
And Dumoulin and Froome have never been the same since...both went on a downward trajectory after doing the Giro/TdF double. Why do you guys want to burn riders out?
Marco Pantani died 6 years after the Giro/Tour double. He might be onto something here.Why are you asking me that?
And how does what you are saying make any sense?
Froomes demise has everything to do with the crash he suffered. An injury that is basically career ending.
And to some degree Tom was also struck by injuries. He hurt his knee pretty badly in the 2019 Giro, if I am not mistaken. He then faced mental and motivational issues. He was "never the same" because of a lot of different factors.
Honestly we have a track recordMarco Pantani died 6 years after the Giro/Tour double. He might be onto something here.
Maybe they’re right…I don't think Evenepoel should do Giro-Tour for GC next year but Froome's decline had nothing to do with him doing the double and I would argue that it was at best a secondary factor in Dumoulin's case.
Honestly with how wrecked after everyone else was besides himself and how hard it was, Contador’s 2011 Giro and Tour is a better attempt than Froome and Dumoulin. Contador was far more animate in both races, putting in big attacks, and if he didn’t have the crash or attacking like crazy he could have finished on the podium. It just took extra time to add up in his form and the mad lad did it twice!Maybe they’re right…
Contador was not the same after doing the double.
Indeed, if you let a long enough span of years go by, no one is the same after performing in some previous, because everyone’s career trajectory (even Valverde’s, though we had to wonder for a while) eventually trends downward.Maybe they’re right…
Contador was not the same after doing the double.
Quintana was not the same after doing the double.
Froome was not the same after doing the trouble.
Dumoulin was not the same after doing the double.
MVDP is not the same after doing the double.
![]()
Age didn’t cause Valverde’s decline, the triple did.Indeed, if you let a long enough span of years go by, no one is the same after performing in some previous, because everyone’s career trajectory (even Valverde’s, though we had to wonder for a while) eventually trends downward.![]()
