To be fair to Valverde, he crashed out in 2005 and 2006. In 2005 he won against Lance on Courchevel and looked fine for a podium. 2006 he was actually probably the biggest favorite after Basso, Ullrich and Vino didn't race, crashed again. 2007 he was off halfway through the race for some reason. 2008 he crashed right before Hautacam and shipped lots of time and looked good in the Alps. Then Tour-suspension in 2009 and real suspension 10 and 11, comeback 12 and looked good for a podium until QS did him dirty in the crosswinds in 2013. 2014 should have podiummed, very disappointing performance. 2015 podium. 2016 did the Giro, but 2017 was a real shot against a crappy field, but crashed again in his best season to date.The same GT Kelly and Valverde won, two riders who struggled in the Giro and Tour except for one exceptional year. Valverde finished on the podium in the Tour, but it was an exceptional year.
I think that's the case with Remco. He could have a good Tour, like last year, and he could even win the Giro some year, but I think he'll have more bad years than good in those GT. The level in the Tour is higher.
The Vuelta is different; the mountain stages are generally less hard, and that's evident in the winners' list. There are several riders who weren't the best in GT but still managed to win the Vuelta.
What Im trying to say his Valverde's Tour palmarés doesn't really do him justice at all, even though it wasn't the best race for him, that I admit.
Remco was doing incredibly well last year to finish 3rd racing against Jonas and Pog who were putting up absolutely insane numbers. Some even thought 2nd was possible. A better route, a few years without a problem and then who knows. But lots of things have happened to Remco which has made him underperform in several GTs for different reasons, but when he's on (Vuelta 22 and Tour 24), he is almost as good as anybody. Well, he is as good as anybody bar Jonas and Pog doing numbers out of this world.