If de lie had waited just 200 meters he might have won . But it was a fair gamble
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Cort must go for the stage win tomorrow if he wants to win the GC. The two flat finishes favours De Lie.
How are they same time in GC? Did Lotto and Uno X ride the same time yesterday?
He would have won if Cort wasn't such a beast on uphill finishes. I actually think De Lie did better than expected considering the trouble he had been in earlier.Only saw the last 500m. Why did De Lie went so early? Not the smartest.
Yeah, that would have been cool!Should have been bonus seconds sprints on Magelsø Bakken (stage 4) rather hill sprints.
UCI rules don't allow this, by the way. Normally Cort should be the leader:No Lotto was 4s (and some tenth) faster so De Lie is in the lead. Cort took 4 boni's more ofcourse.
There seems to be "local" rules. Let's see if we will get a statement from the organizers.UCI rules don't allow this, by the way.
yeah, but normally they can't just write a roadbook which is not in accordance with UCI rules.There seems to be "local" rules. Let's see if we will get a statement from the organizers.
yeah, but normally they can't just write a roadbook which is not in accordance with UCI rules.
Which this is not:
a) Individual classification
The times as recorded by the timekeeper commissaires shall be entered in the general time classifications. Bonuses are only taken into consideration for the individual general classification.
Where two or more riders make the same time in the general individual time placings, the fractions of a second registered during team time trials shall be added back into the total time to decide the order.
If the result is still tied the placings obtained in each stage shall be added and, as a last resort, the place obtained in the last stage ridden shall be taken into consideration. According to UCI article 2.6.015.
And the problem with that is that it is not a legal format for racing per the UCI.The problem with this is ofcourse the new style TTT's where everyone gets their own time like it is somewhat individual. Technically it's still a TTT so you're correct I guess, but it feels weird tho.
And the problem with that is that it is not a legal format for racing per the UCI.
But even if they were not looking at TT fractions of a second, De Lie would have it on countback:
2nd + 3rd vs 1st + 6th (if taking team positions in St 1),
2nd +10th vs 1st + 18th (from individual timing)
I would think for men's cycling, taking the time for the 1st finisher is possible within the rules:And the problem with that is that it is not a legal format for racing per the UCI.
I guess so, although I am pretty sure that is outside the legislator's intention. I'm sure they were considering having the option of 4th or 5th man when there are 8 or (previously) more in a team.I would think for men's cycling, taking the time for the 1st finisher is possible within the rules:
The specific regulations for the event shall specify on which rider of a team crossing the finishing line the classification of teams will be timed for the finish.
Now, that was a bold callYeah this is definitely over. Group has basically been riding in the wheel of a moto for the last 10km. Peloton has no one in front.
Cort to win.