Mellow Velo said:
Nobody wanted to fall, so what makes it different for him?
Has he already become a prima donna?
Fact is, much of that course was the same tried and tested route as in 2005,
(9.3kms back then) including all of the back end.
In 2005 it was even wetter than today.
Nobody whined then.
As Waterloo Sunrise says, another excuse, but in reality he chose to take no risks on a course that meant to test bike handling skills as well as watt output.
I'm not of opposite opinion at all really, I just wanted to point out how he seems to see it and that it was a very good performance considering that he didn't take any risks at all. Which indicates good or growing form.
Concerning the excuses I guess they really weren't bad. Before this TT the exuse was "I'm not really in form yet and not as good as last year" which is plainly honest. He did come to form in Basque country as he thought he did. So today was the only time he really made an excuse for why he couldn't live up to his real self.
I think his critique of the course was too harsh, but he was pretty frustrated, so I don't care to much about it. He could take more riks once in a while, but maybe he's really not good enough of a bike handler, thats something he'll have to deal with than. But as long as he doesn't star claiming that he couldn't do well because to many non TT specialists competed I don't see a reason to construct the claim that he's a permanet whiner who's always making excuses if it doesn't go his way.
What I do find disturbing in general though is the notion that great seasons have to be repeated or betterd, otherwise the rider must be crap, lazy, making excuses while he in reality just is crap .... and so on. That's really childish talk.