You said 3, it was 2.Yes but I was sure before they showed it...
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
You said 3, it was 2.Yes but I was sure before they showed it...
So do we think the UAE lineup are going to be let out of the country with all their limbs intact?
Also pretty funny that nobody decided it was a bad idea to give Van Eetvelt 6 free seconds on Friday. Decathlon may have the bikes now, but the brains still need some work.
"3 or something like that." Then when you asked if I was sure, I was because they had shown the difference to have been clocked at 22 seconds.You said 3, it was 2.
Click the ignore button.It is time to shut up again. Make it a minute this time.
Ok? Was just asking."3 or something like that." Then when you asked if I was sure, I was because they had shown the difference to have been clocked at 22 seconds.
Thats really relevant.
You really know a lot about nothing.Oh, please stop trying to be serious about this now. We both know it was a joke when you said it and I responded as if I took it serious, let's just leave it at that.
Ok? Was just asking.
No need to be defensive.
Then they showed on screen. Dont understand the problem.
You can never know for sure, but the requisite work to pull back Van Eetvelt was almost 0, and the chances of this scenario, while not that high, were not.Okay, how the hell were they supposed to know that this was exactly how it would play out?
Thats really not the case, since I was asking if they had the same time or if it was one second before knowing when they had stopped the clock.The problem is that you were second guessing me when I was right the whole time, and then responded as if I only knew because I saw the GC time on screen. And then keep pretending I don't have a clue.
Embarrassing race by UAE. Haven't done everything right after stage 1.
But nothing new - every time Andrej Hauptman is in the car they sucks tactical, he can only win with Pogacar.
^Keeps following me around, keeps harassing me, keeps being in your head rent-free.If people would ever listen to Salvarini, this is the time.
IPT has become better too, seems like approach worksBeing relegated was all it took to turn Lotto into a proper WT team. Other teams should try the same approach.
You can never know for sure, but the requisite work to pull back Van Eetvelt was almost 0, and the chances of this scenario, while not that high, were not.
O'Connor was arguably favoured to overtake Vine today after Jebel Jais, but yes, UAE were just as stupid. UAE riding like brainless idiots is a given when Pogacar isn't involved, though.But shouldn't it have been UAE's responsibility?
I think the probability of this scenario was close to 0 (that Vine and McNulty both crack and that Van Eetvelt rides everyone off his wheel and finishes exactly between 20 and 26 seconds in front of O'Connor).
I'm sure we would have ridiculed Decathlon for chasing the other day if they had chosen to do so.
Evenepoel, Van Wilder, De Plus, Van Eetvelt, Uijtdebroeks... I don't consider Vansevenant, Lecerf (yet at least), Vanhoucke, Van Gils, Vervaeke, Cras etc elite level climbers. Who are you thinking of?Van Eetvelt was really impressive. The Belgian climbing project is incredibly successful, just a few years ago they had zero elite level climbers and now they have at least a dozen.