AussieGoddess said:
I have a question.
If (and I assume it will be) the arbitration is private ... can USADA release transcripts, give interviews, release their testimony in part or full, make statements etc after the hearing?
or is it full secrecy?
[updated]
There would only definately be the finding of the panel, unless Armstrong releases stuff.
With a rules change, agencies can comment (give interviews) as the case progresses, hence statements from Tygart about the Armstrong case. They might take that as license to release transcripts, or may not.
Should Armstrong release stuff, there will be question whether it is complete, as Armstrong has a history of highly selective transparency.
USADA might take incompleteness as something that should be corrected by their own complete or selective release.
Landis, at least as far as I was able to determine, was pretty complete with his release of information presented at the hearing, and because it was public, USADA put most stuff up at least for a while.
If anything later history has shown, sending or saying anything to Landis is likely to result in it becoming public one way or another.
-dB