mastersracer said:
If USADA can give only a reduced suspension (1 year), why haven't any other riders been charged, specifically the four active riders (LL, CVV, GH, DZ). I thought admission of doping was sufficient to be sanctioned (wasn't that the case with Millar?). Some of the charges include LA administering prohibited substances to others, which would amount to doping.
I believe the minimum sentence is actually 6 months, and I wouldn't be surprised if all of those guys have their suspensions announced fairly soon...like, right after the TDF. I have to wonder if that wasn't a motivating factor for them removing themselves from Olympic consideration.
Also, since they're active witnesses it wouldn't surprise me if action isn't started against them until LA's trial is completed (but before the CAS appeal). I would imagine that USADA will gerrymander the suspension in a way that it impacts the riders the least amount, as a consideration to them for their cooperation. Personally, I think 1 year is reasonable. You have to give them consideration for cooperating, but they shouldn't just walk, either.
I don't really see what leverage these guys have. They testified for the GJ. Then, they supposedly give sworn testimony to the USADA. If that's the case, and the stories don't match, then they're looking at perjury charges, and visions of Marion Jones start dancing in their collective heads. So, they pretty much HAD to have consistent testimony. At least that's the way I see it. So, USADA really already had built-in leverage against these guys. A reduced suspension really just seems like a courtesy more than a necessity.