Bavarianrider said:Not one true mountain stage.
Lol. Doesn't matter. There aren't any Flat ITTs either.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Bavarianrider said:Not one true mountain stage.
Bavarianrider said:There is not even one stage where there are to meaningful climbs in the finale. It's always a one climb uphill sprint finsih more or less. If this was the Tour you would have trashed it for the lack of true mountain stages.
Bavarianrider said:There is not even one stage where there are to meaningful climbs in the finale. It's always a one climb uphill sprint finsih more or less. If this was the Tour you would have trashed it for the lack of true mountain stages.
Eshnar said:This is the prototype of the new generation "youtube races"
A good chance to see a cracking 10 minutes every day. But zero chance to see more. And... If you pile up all the mountains of this race you'll realize this Vuelta isn't mountainous at all.
Everyone has his own tastes ofc. Personally, this route sucks more than this year's tdf and Giro.
Eshnar said:Personally, this route sucks more than this year's tdf and Giro.
Maaaaaaaarten said:I agree
A little bit of action on the final climb is as boring as a flat sprint. That is; very exciting for the last few kilometers of the race, but the rest of the racing just becomes pointless.
I'd rather have more sprint stages, and a few real climbing stages that at least offer the oppertunity for action if the riders are willing.
Eshnar said:This is the prototype of the new generation "youtube races"
A good chance to see a cracking 10 minutes every day. But zero chance to see more. And... If you pile up all the mountains of this race you'll realize this Vuelta isn't mountainous at all.
Everyone has his own tastes ofc. Personally, this route sucks more than this year's tdf and Giro.
10 minutes of entertainment were pretty much in every stage of both Giro and Tour, even if we felt disappointed because the opportunities were much bigger. It's true that this Giro promised more than it actually provided, but its route did have defects (backloading, lack of ITT), which we did discuss straight after the route was unveiled. Saying that in the end routes don't matter because riders make the race, you can never know, etc,etc, is a bit like saying "Do not go all in with 4 aces, because in the end you can never know whether your opponent has a royal flush or not" [ofc I exaggerated a little bit but I hope you got it]Dutchsmurf said:Lets save that criticism until after the race shall we? I mean the Giro stages seemed to offer far more opportunities than we got to see used in the end. In the end it is the riders that make the race. And even if we only get a cracking 10 minutes each day, it still will be more than the Tour or Giro provided.
Zam_Olyas said:Stage 15 - Lagos de Covadonga
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEJc7mnSKAw
lucho in 86
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IXFBXow79k
Dutchsmurf said:Lets save that criticism until after the race shall we? I mean the Giro stages seemed to offer far more opportunities than we got to see used in the end. In the end it is the riders that make the race. And even if we only get a cracking 10 minutes each day, it still will be more than the Tour or Giro provided.
Agreed, this parcours looks far better than the Tour's this year, at least there are some half decent mountain top finishes. The stages are more varied in order than the Giro's were this year too, with some mountains appearing early in the second week.alberto.legstrong said:+1, seriously. Criticism is coming in a bit early. How bout they race a little and then come back? If you find it boring then, then fair enough.