Son of Amsterhammer said:
Yates was a worthy winner. Hard to see him winning if the big guns were there though.
He dropped the biggest guns for fun for much of the Giro. His level in his second GT was probably lower, but so would their’s have been. I don’t think we’ve seen anyone climbing as well as him this year when you take into account both his GT rides.
There remain question marks about his endurance over three weeks, so I’m not saying that he would definitely have won. Maybe he’d have had to go deeper and blown up again. But it seems very strange to say that it’s hard to see him winning when he was a better climber than any of them for two and a half weeks in one GT and then demonstrated that three weeks is possible for him in his second GT. It’s easy to see him winning. Maintain his Giro performance for three weeks and he wins, unless GT organisers revert to old school TT lengths.