• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Vuelta a España 2016 Rumours

It was about time:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/vuelta-a-espana-will-start-in-galicia-in-2016/

The Vuelta departure host town has been usually announced during the second rest day of the race in recent years. The change of plans this year after the bid from Porto was pulled out has delayed this a few days. So we are in for new start from Galicia as in 2013, although next year will be from the landlocked province of Ourense to visit the other three provinces in the first stages.
 
I have been scouting Spanish forums and cycling sites in recent days, but I haven't found any reliable clue. Some people were suggesting that the last mountain block would be in the South but as of now it all looks like wishful thinking.

I can only have a guess about those rumours from unofficial sources of a visit to the Pyrenees. The Tour web site announced during the Tour second rest day the signature of an agreement between ASO and the Government of Andorra for a Tour stage finish, rest day and stage departure next year. So if the Vuelta goes to the Pyrenees next year, a visit to Andorra is not very likely.
http://www.letour.com/le-tour/2015/us/pre-race/news/ahc/tour-2016-to-visit-andorra.html
 
He did confirm the Vuelta aims to stick to a similar overall structure to that of recent editions, with summit finishes coming as soon as the first week and probably just one individual time trial. “Television audience figures and the number of roadside viewers confirm this is the right strategy, despite some criticism,” Guillen said.

I think this is fine as long as the Tour steps up and includes some more ITT, as Guillen says that is what the audience generally wants.
 
This is old news from a few days after the presentation of the 2015 course. Although race departure has been moved from Porto to Galicia, the return to la Camperona at the end of the first week still fits in.

http://www.diariodeleon.es/noticias/deportes/camperona-vuelta-2016_951300.html

Of course, we will not have to wait one week for the first murito. Ezaro is also on the cards, although that may just be because it's the only one that sticks in the mind of Galician journalists.

http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/noticia/ourense/2015/09/11/vuelta-espana-2016-saldra-ourense-suena-fuerza-nuevo-final-ezaro/00031441965015892161936.htm
 
Re:

ice&fire said:
This is old news from a few days after the presentation of the 2015 course. Although race departure has been moved from Porto to Galicia, the return to la Camperona at the end of the first week still fits in.

http://www.diariodeleon.es/noticias/deportes/camperona-vuelta-2016_951300.html

Of course, we will not have to wait one week for the first murito. Ezaro is also on the cards, although that may just be because it's the only one that sticks in the mind of Galician journalists.

http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/noticia/ourense/2015/09/11/vuelta-espana-2016-saldra-ourense-suena-fuerza-nuevo-final-ezaro/00031441965015892161936.htm
If they're starting in Ourense province, there's always Costiña de Canedo, 2km @ 12% in an absolutely ramrod-straight line just outside Ourense. Descent finish from that (ha! ha! ha!) would make a perfect first road stage for a Vuelta...
 
Aug 2, 2015
71
0
0
Re: Re:

Libertine Seguros said:
ice&fire said:
This is old news from a few days after the presentation of the 2015 course. Although race departure has been moved from Porto to Galicia, the return to la Camperona at the end of the first week still fits in.

http://www.diariodeleon.es/noticias/deportes/camperona-vuelta-2016_951300.html

Of course, we will not have to wait one week for the first murito. Ezaro is also on the cards, although that may just be because it's the only one that sticks in the mind of Galician journalists.

http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/noticia/ourense/2015/09/11/vuelta-espana-2016-saldra-ourense-suena-fuerza-nuevo-final-ezaro/00031441965015892161936.htm
If they're starting in Ourense province, there's always Costiña de Canedo, 2km @ 12% in an absolutely ramrod-straight line just outside Ourense. Descent finish from that (ha! ha! ha!) would make a perfect first road stage for a Vuelta...
Descend finishes in this year Vuelta ended up being quite succesful so i won't be shocked if in another editions there will be let's say one descend finish replacing eventual murito finish. There might be some propability of a descend finish similar to Navacerrada one close to or on 20th stage to try and reproduce this year stage.
 
Re:

Red Rick said:
Surprise surprise.

Would be a great climb to have 10-15km from the finish
I agree, but a finish 10-15km from Ézaro would be in the middle of nowhere. They'd need almost 20km to put the finish at one of the villages at the sea and 2013 already showed that the bunch may regroup in less than that. If they stretch that to 25km they might do a loop and climb it twice. But please, don't tell Unipublic ;)
 
The town of Betanzos in Galicia expects confirmation from Unipublic to host a stage departure.
http://www.laopinioncoruna.es/deportes/2015/10/06/betanzos-espera-confirmacion-vuelta-acoger/1001288.html

The link mentions a possible stage finish in Serra da Capelada, somewhere between the villages of Cedeira and Ortigueira in the north of Galicia. There's a very scenic place known as Garita da Herbeira at nearly 600m above the sea level with views like this one. The profiles I've found don't show the ridiculous gradients of climbs like Ézaro or Cumbres del Sol.
 
It's about 8km at 7% iirc. PRC did a whole investigation into possibilities for using Las Rías Altas here including two suggested stages:

ribadeo-cedeira.png


coruc3b1a-cedeira.png


Trasmonte is short but steep, but the descent is very narrow, therefore the run-in from the second option may be a bit too difficult to incorporate.