HSNHSN said:
Before I saw this thread, I hadn't really thought much about the issue. By now, I think one of the main distinguishing features is the amount of harm a method of cheating does, mainly to others. The fourth and fifth option seem to be the worst ones in this respect, since they will harm other riders and this may even be career-ending or life-threatening. The other options then are pretty hard to actually order. Tacks on the road mostly cause punctures, but as we saw in the 2012 TdF may also result in falls and broken bones. Then, most doping methods are most likely to harm the rider who actually dopes, but there are still rumours about the many crashes being caused by tramadol use, etc.
I suppose we need to go back to the original question and ask 'worse' in what way?
Extent of potential physical/bodily damage from one instance?
Singular economic consequence?
Extent that it is practiced?
Amount of distortion currently caused?
Many of the items on the list (e.g. crashing someone) are readily observable, and would likely result in quick reaction with consequence - even where the consequence is merely relegation.
Doping, however, is extensively practiced.
Where the financial gains are huge, the consequences of getting caught are minor. No prospect of even economic consequence other than paying back winnings. No fines, no jail, etc. Bans can be reduced.
Moreover, it never seems to get anywhere close to the universal condemnation that it deserves. In other words, 'we' let them get away with it.
Apologists actively or unknowingly conspire to further minimize negative consequence. 'Oh, the Tour is so hard they need to do it' type of BS.
On that basis alone, doping should be recognized as the worst. It is the most extensively practiced, least policed, punishments are inconveniences.
Just look at the 'abandoned' results from the Tour, let alone the asterisks like Indurain or the retained titles of dopers Riis, Pantani, Ullrich and Contadope let alone the Schleckette curiosity.
Since 1991 we have only, what, five Tours without current doping uncertainty?
That is a less than 25% clear winner success rate. That is less than a one in four chance of having a winner be a winner. The likelihood of any of the remainder not doping is also questionable.
The Tour de France results tell us everything we need to know. The poll results are in; cyclists are dopers.
Doping's extensive practice in cycling has made a mockery of the sport.
That doping cannot be easily singled out in this discussion as the worst form of cheating underscores that we will be stuck with doping for generations to come.
Dave.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram