- Jan 11, 2010
- 15,760
- 4,756
- 28,180
Okay, touché. But who is most likely to follow Pogacar, at least for a while? Pedersen or Evenepoel?Mads Pedersen in the last 4 years: 8th, 3d, 22nd, 2nd.
Okay, touché. But who is most likely to follow Pogacar, at least for a while? Pedersen or Evenepoel?Mads Pedersen in the last 4 years: 8th, 3d, 22nd, 2nd.
45 this year then, and next is hisMads Pedersen in the last 4 years: 8th, 3d, 22nd, 2nd.
That remains to be seen. But anyway, your point was it is now a race very much suited for climbers. I don't think so, I think it's a race for explosive riders.Okay, touché. But who is most likely to follow Pogacar, at least for a while? Pedersen or Evenepoel?
Did you somehow calculate 45 or just a random position?45 this year then, and next is his
Maybe not pure climbers, but the way the course is now, and the way it's raced, make it very difficult for a guy like Pedersen or Van Aert to win... but then again that's the case in every race where Pogacar takes part.That remains to be seen. But anyway, your point was it is now a race very much suited for climbers. I don't think so, I think it's a race for explosive riders.
I did a quick double blinded randomised statical analysis, and come up with the beautiful number #45Did you somehow calculate 45 or just a random position?
I think the energy cost at that point is just too high because the peloton is so big you just waste a bunch of energy against organized teams.Maybe even 2nd time Kwaremont. If he's badly positioned the 2nd time, it might already be over
I also don't see how could Mads or Wout follow Pogacar in the old route. The combination of Kwaremont+Paterberg+Koppenberg+Taaienberg was also there.Maybe not pure climbers, but the way the course is now, and the way it's raced, make it very difficult for a guy like Pedersen or Van Aert to win... but then again that's the case in every race where Pogacar takes part.
It was much earlier in the race, and the 2 of them usually don't get dropped for good until the final OK.I also don't see how could Mads or Wout follow Pogacar in the old route. The combination of Kwaremont+Paterberg+Koppenberg+Taaienberg was also there.
It's not like Pogacar can't rip a race with 100km to go. Last year, Pogacar without MVP would just ride away after the Koppenberg. The difference was massive between Pogacar and the rest (excluding MVP).It was much earlier in the race, and the 2 of them usually don't get dropped for good until the final OK.
He got cooperation from Van der Poel, van Aert, Pedersen and whatnot, and in the end he finished a grand 2 minutes ahead of a 45 man group after a solo of 18km.It's not like Pogacar can't rip a race with 100km to go. Last year, Pogacar without MVP would just ride away after the Koppenberg. The difference was massive between Pogacar and the rest (excluding MVP).
The profile of E3 is very different from the profile of RVV, specially the last 30-40km. I don't think it's comparable at all. And let's also not forget, Pogacar gained more than 30" in a headwind against Mads-Stuyven-Wout-MVP (and they were cooperating).He got cooperation from Van der Poel, van Aert, Pedersen and whatnot, and in the end he finished a grand 2 minutes ahead of a 45 man group after a solo of 18km.
Van der Poel was dying after 60km solo versus a very lacklustre chase group in E3.
Or are we assuming 3 times the motorpacing of Sanremo
That's a stretchPogacar gained more than 30" in a headwind against Mads-Stuyven-Wout-MVP (and they were cooperating).
If Pidcock can stay with Pogacar on Poggio, Remco can stay with Tadej on Paterberg. 😱It's irrelevant, MvdP should drop Remco on Paterberg and if he doesn't it means he's cooked, they won't catch Pogacar as a result. Plus, there's tailwind towards the finish, better chance for an attacker to stay away
Imagine if Remco drops Tadej and decides to become a classics rider. 😱I've been saying for a long time that he should do Flanders (Sanremo as well), so I'm glad to see him on the start list. I think he should be able to do very well, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him on the podium. He has a very good build for the race, lots of power, great acceleration and is good technically. Positioning is the biggest worry, but the way these races are ridden these days, positioning should matter less (as long as he's in position when Pogacar or Van der Poel make their initial attack).
I've been saying for a long time that he should do Flanders (Sanremo as well), so I'm glad to see him on the start list. I think he should be able to do very well, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him on the podium. He has a very good build for the race, lots of power, great acceleration and is good technically. Positioning is the biggest worry, but the way these races are ridden these days, positioning should matter less (as long as he's in position when Pogacar or Van der Poel make their initial attack).
His yearly absence from MSR is a mystery to me - perhaps to save himself for Belgian classics. If it was the same course in Belgium he'd race it every season.
He also said the combination MSR-Catalunya-RVV would be too much. I tend to agree with thathe said today that the weather in Tenerife was why he did not do MSR
I mean fair enough, but the way the question for the poll is framed I ubderstand a vote for "Top 5" as "he is getting precisely 4th or 5th" and there is no way thats more likely than him finishing outside the top 20.I think barring crashes or badly timed mechanicals I don't see any reason to expect Evenepoel to not be among the 5 strongest riders in the finale.
I think both exactly 4th and exactly 5th are more likely than finishing but outside the top 20.I mean fair enough, but the way the question for the poll is framed I ubderstand a vote for "Top 5" as "he is getting precisely 4th or 5th" and there is no way thats more likely than him finishing outside the top 20.
