The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Why the need to do that?Benotti69 said:Full and complete transparency at UCI.
Take UCI out of Switzerland at some point in the future.
Dr. Maserati said:Why the need to do that?
If he makes anti-doping independent then the UCI reverts to its actual stated objectives.
Basically worrying about sock length.
happychappy said:Whatever he needs to do to maintain the UCI stranglehold on all forms of professional cycling and not least maximize his personal paycheck.
Everything else is irrelevant.
Hein was corrupt. Not the UCI.Benotti69 said:You think UCI are only corrupt on doping?
Taking 3million dollars (iirc) from Japan Cycling to push for the Keirin in Olympics is not doping related.
Isn't that the action of a dictator?spalco said:Clean house - fire/retire any permanent employees in the UCI with questionable (Verbruggen-McQuaid) loyalties.
the sceptic said:Anyone think we'll have a non british tour winner under Cookson?
the sceptic said:Anyone think we'll have a non british tour winner under Cookson?
the sceptic said:Anyone think we'll have a non british tour winner under Cookson?
martinvickers said:Yes. Actually. In fact, I'd nearly guarantee it.
So many disappointed to see the back of Pat. So many hooked on the soap, not the sport.
Yeah, tough day, guys.
the sceptic said:Anyone think we'll have a non british tour winner under Cookson?
martinvickers said:Yes. Actually. In fact, I'd nearly guarantee it.
So many disappointed to see the back of Pat. So many hooked on the soap, not the sport.
Yeah, tough day, guys.