You know I see a lot of talk about fans wanting to contact federations, but what I do not see, not anywhere in this thread, is what the 'fans' want changed.
So what is the plan?
Are we supposed to flood the National Federation with angry rants demanding 'more' be done to eliminate doping?
OK, well, as someone involved in a profession, and having been in contact with many professions, there is a Golden Rule about raising issues and concerns: Problems.
If you have a problem, you should also have a proposed solution.
So what is it that the 'fans' want done? What is the platform that the 'fans' are advocating? If all we are going to do is send angry letters to National Federations, we are simply going to be ignored and the contact information will become even harder to find - further removing 'fan' influence from the process.
I do not think there is a National Federation out there that is unaware of the 'fan' desire to remove doping from the sport. I am sure that they would welcome constructive recommendations that help them achieve that end.
In the abscence of an agreed upon platform, I fear all the Federations will get is angry-grams which would be unhelpful at best. So what changes do the 'fans' want? What changes or actions should they be taking? And, with enough consensus generated, approach the National Federations with framework for progress?
Just writing angry letters doesn't always go the way the people who write them seem to think - on either side:
http://cyclocosm.com/2011/02/raw-documents-the-verbruggenlandis-exchange/
So what is the plan?
Are we supposed to flood the National Federation with angry rants demanding 'more' be done to eliminate doping?
OK, well, as someone involved in a profession, and having been in contact with many professions, there is a Golden Rule about raising issues and concerns: Problems.
If you have a problem, you should also have a proposed solution.
So what is it that the 'fans' want done? What is the platform that the 'fans' are advocating? If all we are going to do is send angry letters to National Federations, we are simply going to be ignored and the contact information will become even harder to find - further removing 'fan' influence from the process.
I do not think there is a National Federation out there that is unaware of the 'fan' desire to remove doping from the sport. I am sure that they would welcome constructive recommendations that help them achieve that end.
In the abscence of an agreed upon platform, I fear all the Federations will get is angry-grams which would be unhelpful at best. So what changes do the 'fans' want? What changes or actions should they be taking? And, with enough consensus generated, approach the National Federations with framework for progress?
Just writing angry letters doesn't always go the way the people who write them seem to think - on either side:
http://cyclocosm.com/2011/02/raw-documents-the-verbruggenlandis-exchange/