VeloFidelis said:Now there's a contradiction for you: I hate to see racers cheat, but I love to see cheaters race.
I think everybody racing today either cheats or has cheated in the past.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
VeloFidelis said:Now there's a contradiction for you: I hate to see racers cheat, but I love to see cheaters race.
horseman said:I have similar feelings, even before his 'troubles' I didn't like hearing him being interviewed, something about him just didn't gel for me.
forty four said:hes one of the few riders i just dont like regardless of the charges against him. i really dislike his demeanor and vibe in general seems like a shady guy to me.
The GCW said:In many ways, I didn't agree with the Chicken getting burnt.
Contador didn't win the Tour, in My opin.
We should all hope Rasmussen returns; He was an exciting racer and made the race interesting.
If Michael is found guilty of anything it is after the fact and My opin could change but at the moment, He is only guilty of misplacement.
During the Tour of 2007, I know where He was.
VeloFidelis said:I am all in favor of riders being welcomed back into the pro peloton after serving their suspensions. Generally only a few get caught for what many are doing, and it will always be that way.
But I couldn't disagree more with your assessment that Rasmussen is not guilty of anything. Purposely misleading the UCI and your team as to your whereabouts for several weeks is a doping positive. There is only one reason for doing it, and that reason was obvious on the mountain stages in the 07 Tour