A
Anonymous
Guest
The more i look at the reports on CN (and i no longer visit but see links on twitter to articles) the more i realise that 90% of the controversial ones are just rehashed from elsewhere.
"as reported on ARD"
"as reported in the new york times"
as reported in this, as reported on that.
The reports that seem to be original are the exclusive looks at team x's kit, or team y's bike.
Are cycling news just scared of reporting anything controversial themselves in case they lose the shack banner adverts, or another teams exclusive training camp photos?
"as reported on ARD"
"as reported in the new york times"
as reported in this, as reported on that.
The reports that seem to be original are the exclusive looks at team x's kit, or team y's bike.
Are cycling news just scared of reporting anything controversial themselves in case they lose the shack banner adverts, or another teams exclusive training camp photos?