the big ring
BANNED
- Jul 28, 2009
- 2,135
- 0
- 0
D-Queued said:I have asthma.
I wasn't born with it.
I am not alone.
. . . .
I have had extensive testing, and asthma medication does not return me to normal let alone above normal. . . . . Dave.
LauraLyn said:Dave, it is my sentiment as well.
...
the big ring said:Greg, it is very clear you have no tickets on yourself, and I do not see it the way "Realist" does.
Fully agree power output values can be deceptive. I've gone training with guys who clearly have more power than me, smashing me up every climb. Come race day the roles are reversed. I've also won races at 80% ftiness purely because I knew I was underdone so raced much more conservatively than I usually do.
If power was all it was about we wouldn't even have to race. Just jump on an ergo and bang out a ramp test to exhaustion.
There's so much more.
Realist said:Power isn't the be all and end all, but it's the price of admission at the top level. You can race well with less, and even win, but you'll never go up a notch. I have plenty of anecdotes about guys with less power winning, including myself, and I've explained this exact thing to plenty of people. I'm not part of the Strava generation. But at 340w, 67kg, you're just not cut out for it. Everything ain't for everyone man.
the big ring said:What were your preferred dope-free recovery techniques?
Realist said:But at 340w, 67kg, you're just not cut out for it.
Realist said:Everything ain't for everyone man.
Realist said:Power isn't the be all and end all. . . . But at 340w, 67kg, you're just not cut out for it. Everything ain't for everyone man.
LauraLyn said:I think it was Gregg's point that there are many factors that can contribute to someone becoming a top cyclist. And some of those "factors" aren't worthy it. For example, losing your honor and dignity.
ebandit said:well said!
keep posting your thoughts.............ignore the forum bullies who just because they have amassed thousands of posts think that it is acceptable to tell others what to do
GreggGermer said:...
I think why I'm so bent on arguing with you, some random interwebber, is that I've had others in my past tell me "I would never make it as a pro" or "I should set my goals a little lower" ...
GreggGermer said:I guess I was just a dreamer who waisted my life having some kick-*** experiences in Europe and living my dream. What a waist of so many years![]()
![]()
![]()
Yup, that is true ... but why harp on what YOU think my ability was and could have be.
...I could have been at my true limit, but I'm convinced I wasn't. My pro teams were not even close to the ideal development situation. There was still room to improve those areas, training could be adapted and progress could be made.
In the end I did three years as a pro in Europe. More than most, less than some. I raced most of the big semi-classics in Belgium and held my own against the worlds best. I wasn't by any means the best rider out there, but I also wasn't the worst. For me you don't spend three years racing in Europe on pro teams as a foreigner as a fluke.
Realist said:You're the one who hold yourself out to be this pro rider who was held back by the scourge of doping though no one ever offered you drugs .
the big ring said:Originally Posted by Realist
You're the one who hold yourself out to be this pro rider who was held back by the scourge of doping though no one ever offered you drugs .
Completely and utterly disagree. Your reading / comprehension filter is decidedly warped.
Vaughters: “And think about the talented athletes who did make the right choice and walked away. They were punished for following their moral compass and being left behind. How do they reconcile the loss of their dream?”
This is unfortunately a question he can’t answer, but I can.
I wasn’t hugely vocal about my anti-doping stance. I knew better back in the early 2000’s to stand up and shout “Look at me, I’m clean!”
My rebellion against doping went on as far as legitimately looking into establishing a program similar in scope to the Bike Pure movement has established, but with the use of actual contracts with real financial penalties against those who violated the trust of the agreement by doping. My teammates thought the idea was crazy and I wasn’t willing to put my name to the idea for fear of being blacklisted. So the idea stayed an idea …
...as I sat in the cafe I told my team director how tired I was, how much I hurt and that I just wanted to survive the day. He pulled a couple of pills out of his pocket and said, “Take two of these”. I took the two pills without a second thought or regard as to what they were and downed them with some coffee. Only seconds later it dawned on me that I had no clue what I just took. Thoughts ran through my head of racing my head off on two amphetamine pills or something even crazier! But quickly I realized it was probably nothing and asked what I just took. Two Ibuprofen pills … confirmed by the small package in his pocket, but even then I felt I had stepped into an area I didn’t want to be.
Realist said:Look, Tyler is courageous. He is telling the truth despite an army of lawyers trying to step on him. He faced his demons. Bassons is even more courageous. This is just grandstanding and it demeans both those who faced real temptation and gave in and, even more, those who faced it and stood up and said no.
momotaro said:Thanks for the read, Gregg: it brought back memories from my short time in the Ghent scene. I think the story is very typical: good North American amateur goes to Belgium to race. *** is handed to him in the first few races by a bunch of juiced up euros. Suffers on a very meger salary and lousy lifestyle for a few years, and slowly starts to understand how to win or at least be competitive. Starts to figure out where he stands in terms of ability, earning potential, drugs, future, etc. Returns to North America a better man.
Same thing happened to me and and many others. In the end it is as much about money as it is about the dope. In my time (1999-2001), I don't think the local kermese crew could afford much more than caffeine and ephidrine. Most of them could barely afford dinner!
Other points:
In my era, we did not have power meters on bikes, so I can't comment on FTP, or W/kg. Maybe some one can estimate mine from the following data: 71kg, 5.8L/min MVO2, I did several "stepped" tests on the computrainer: 30 watt increments, 3 minute stages, I could complete the 470 Watt stage, but not fully complete the 500 Watt stage. I dunno, does this put my FTP in the low 400 range?
My point is that my housemate (who was on the same Flanders team BTW), could not match my numbers, but he was winning kermese. He would get away very early and then hold out until the main selection was made. He then would hang on until the sprint and then win the sprint. Smart guy, but it took him at least a year to figure it out. He never got a decent contract and came back home.
Myself? I raced about 6 weeks in Belgium, not enough time to figure out how the races unfold. I placed in a criterium by making the break, but the race was bought out (I did not speak flemish, so I did not even get a cut). The racing is fast, but not insanely fast. Went on to do some national team stuff and raced in a 2.1 next to the real superstars...now that is insanely fast. Once I took a realistic look at my ability, the hardship of the sport, the lack of money, the likely need to take drugs, and the general uncertainty of a future in general, I chose to finish my Masters, and get a regular job.
In the end it was mostly about money and the future and to a smaller degree about the drugs.
Two of my teammates and at least 6 from my "era" have made it to the ProTour and make good money (at least some of them I know to be clean). I think all of them were more talented than me. Many more have done the Pro Conti thing and have had a nice career, but certainly not rich.
BTW: I never took anything. I tried one caffiene pill (before caffiene pills were on the banned list), and it gave me massive stomach cramps. No tent, no ephidrine, no inhalers, nothing. Would like to say that I was super moral, but I think it just did not make sense to dope at the level I was racing. Now, if doping meant a six figure, multi-year contract I would have a harder time staying moral. Not sure that I would have done it, but definitely would give it some thought.
Realist said:You're the one who hold yourself out to be this pro rider who was held back by the scourge of doping though no one ever offered you drugs . It wasn't even on the radar for someone at your level. It's no different to a random cat 3 writing it. I mean, cool, I didn't use drugs either and neither did my cat 4 housemate. I did have a doctor tell me what worked and what didn't once, and a rider offer to show me how to inject. 'Just for vitamins'. I didn't dope, even though I was given the option. Of course, it would have made no sense to put my health at risk because I wasn't at that level where the reward is super-high, so I am in no position to get self-righteous about this and criticise dopers too harshly and claim I had all these things taken away from me by them. Same applies to you.
Seriously? Why did you quit then? Because of the scourge of drugs you never even saw?
esafosfina said:And yes, I was pro at the highest of levels.