Why is Solon's letter to Zomegnan about CERA cover up not being reported?

[Mrs John Murphy]

That's a lot of effort - shame you don't put the same effort into reading and comprehending things before posting.

You can give it out but you just can't take it. You can give it all the bombast you like, but you missed the point and continue to miss it.

You were the one who started with the personal attacks and the false accusations of vendettas and agendas (always the first choice of the lazy fanboy). If you don't like being called for it then don't do it in the first place. You've made your bed and that's the one you've got to lie in.

You're obviously not bothering to read the longer posts I will try to make my point as clear as I can, using few words as possible.

'Even if an accusations is wrong and flawed, in the current climate it should be covered, it is important to expose the accusation as either flawed or valid.'

The problem is that you are so hung up on 'being right' that you can't see the wood for the trees.

 

[Dr. Maserati]

That's a lot of effort - shame you don't put the same effort into reading and comprehending things before posting.

I put the same effort that you did in the post I was responding to.
If you don't like it - then write shorter posts.

You can give it out but you just can't take it. You can give it all the bombast you like, but you missed the point and continue to miss it.

I did a search with the word "vendetta" against my name - until this thread I never used it.

You were the one who started with the personal attacks and the false accusations of vendettas and agendas (always the first choice of the lazy fanboy). If you don't like being called for it then don't do it in the first place. You've made your bed and that's the one you've got to lie in.

I said you didn't like JV - nothing personal in that at all.
Are you denying it?

Calling me a "lazy fanboy" is both personal and more importantly false - as I have shown and proved.

You're obviously not bothering to read the longer posts I will try to make my point as clear as I can, using few words as possible.

Unfortunately I read it all.

'Even if an accusations is wrong and flawed, in the current climate it should be covered, it is important to expose the accusation as either flawed or valid.'

So CN (or whoever) should chase down every single comment or accusation from every blogger or commentator to show what they say is true or not true?

You are also ignoring that CN has actually reported on these 'CERA samples' at the time and updated the news on it at the time.

The problem is that you are so hung up on 'being right' that you can't see the wood for the trees.

No, the 'problem' is that I am right.
You're problem is that you cannot admit that (out of all the pieces you could have picked) you chose to roll in behind a piece that is wrong.

 

[Mrs John Murphy]

You get the personal comments because you were the one who started with that line of argument. To repeat - you've made your bed and that's the one you've got to lie in. No good ****ing crying about it now.

The rest of your 'argument' (and I use the term loosely) I've already answered several times. You missed the point from the start and you're still missing it, but nevermind, at least in your own mind you are king.

 

[Dr. Maserati]

You get the personal comments because you were the one who started with that line of argument. To repeat - you've made your bed and that's the one you've got to lie in. No good ****ing crying about it now.

To repeat, I said you didn't like JV - nothing personal pointing out the obvious.

I even offered you the opportunity to deny - which was more than you gave me.

The rest of your 'argument' (and I use the term loosely) I've already answered several times. You missed the point from the start and you're still missing it, but nevermind, at least in your own mind you are king.

Like a lot of what you say - you tend to over play your hand - I never said I was King, I said I was right on this issue.

Your point was obvious from your OP - believe you me I got it.
In fact you articulated it quite well in the title: "Why is Solon's letter to Zomegnan about CERA cover up not being reported?"

Unfortunately for you, the issue 'Solons letter' is wrong - it is no more complicated than that.

 

[Mrs John Murphy]

You missed the point at the start of the thread and you keep on missing the point. You're pretty much beyond help. You're displaying a rare strand of reactionary ideological dogmatism and stupidity here. Are you quite sure you don't work for the UCI?

The question was 'why are accusations of corruption not being investigated/reported in CN?' - whether Solon's accusations are valid or not is one for Dirty Works original thread in the clinic, not here. Given that you've missed the point here, and you have largely missed Solon's point you aren't in any position to claim to be 'right' about anything.

Anyway, you keep on keeping on.

 

[Dr. Maserati]

You missed the point at the start of the thread and you keep on missing the point. You're pretty much beyond help. You're displaying a rare strand of reactionary ideological dogmatism and stupidity here. Are you quite sure you don't work for the UCI?

The question was 'why are accusations of corruption not being investigated/reported in CN?' - whether Solon's accusations are valid or not is one for Dirty Works original thread in the clinic, not here. Given that you've missed the point here, and you have largely missed Solon's point you aren't in any position to claim to be 'right' about anything.

Anyway, you keep on keeping on.

My sincere apologies - of course I should have realized that a thread with the name Why is Solon's letter to Zomegnan about CERA cover up not being reported? - obviously really really meant "why are accusations of corruption not being investigated/reported in CN?".

How silly of me to read your opening post which refers to Solons letter (which is false) and not work out that it really wasn't about Solons letter at all but clearly meant "why are accusations of corruption not being investigated/reported in CN?".

I apologize profusely that when you referred to Solons letter on post 6, post 8, post 13, post 19 etc - I should have of course realized that you were not talking about Solons letter, RCS or the CERA sample from 2008 - but clearly meant, "why are accusations of corruption not being investigated/reported in CN?".

I feel embarrased and unworthy in not spotting your obvious and clear point which is "why are accusations of corruption not being investigated/reported in CN?" - that to assist you I will highlight some recent (all 2011) reports by CN on corruption;

Armstrong era 'corrupt' says ex-mechanic.
McQuaid: There has never been corruption in the UCI.
Schenk encourages independent investigation of UCI.
Verbruggen criticises the media coverage of doping.
Ashenden’s view on Armstrong doping allegations.