The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
The Hitch said:A professional wrestler. Doping? Gtfo
Justinr said:In my view whats more laughable about the whole US Pro wrestling thing is not that they are obviously pumped with steroids but that the 'match' is so appallingly 'choreographed' and fixed. They're worse actors than soap stars!
punyhuman said:And really, "there's lots of folks who have not doped"? I will need proof of this. Is this a minority number?
punyhuman said:That's only your opinion and not shared by many others.
42x16ss said:Straight up NO. This would send us back to the glory days of:
Riders dying in their sleep from too high a haematocrit like in the early 90's due to excessive EPO
Riders having terrible reactions to poorly carried out blood transfusions like Manzano, Hamilton, and Ricco
Riders almost bleeding to death when they crash because of blood thinners taken to stop their blood coagulating due to too much EPO like Joe Papp
Riders collapsing and even dying from exhaustion due to exceeding their physiological limits and not knowing because of painkillers and amphetamines like Tom Simpson
Riders getting diseases such as anaemia because they don't know how to take their doping products correctly (eg: EPO without B12 and Iron supplementation - this happened to a couple of ex AIS riders I knew)
Riders causing permanent hormonal and physiological imbalances from too much HGH and/or Testosterone and other anabolic substances like Tammy Thomas
Then there's riders running the risk of getting cancer or who knows what else from taking experimental/unreleased/unapproved drugs
If you don't mind the sport having this, fine, but most of us do.
Afrank said:True, but who wants to be a pro rider and not be the best and win a bunch of races? I'd agree there would be some for whom being a pro cyclist for a living is about doing what they love (riding a bike). And who wouldn't feel the need or want to win everything (I truly envy those people). But there is an inherent competitive nature in anyone that takes the path to become a athlete. And most people even if they would prefer to be clean, will be driven by their competitive nature to dope so they can be competitive with others.
Also with the winners doping, I'm sure there would be domestiques that would take it up too. Those that race because it's just what they love to do would likely fall under the category of doms, and they may feel the pressure to dope to keep up with the other domestiques that are doping.
ChewbaccaD said:This thread is proof positive that no thread in the history of the intertubes has ever been worthwhile when it starts with "...lurking for a long time and decided to post..." or some other variant.
You fools are in a troll echelon.
zigmeister said:Ok, well then, why is it that some people are allowed to take some allergy medication, that will either allow them to race, or not? Yet, somebody who has a undetermined pituitary problem and can't maintain a 100ng/mL testosterone level naturally, has to just suffer and isn't allowed to at least take something so they can get up in the morning, train, eat, live a normal life, and maintain a level of let's just say between 300-700ng/mL by taking extraneous testosterone?
zigmeister said:Testosterone of course has a stigma based off ignorance and stupidity perpetrated by most people that somehow if you take extraneous testosterone and your level is say 600-700ng/mL, well below the max limit naturally found of nearly 1200ng/mL, you are some kind of "roider" and are now have some completely unfounded/unproven advantage all of the sudden.