The problem I have is the complete inconsistencies and hypocrisy of the entire situation. The drugs/items on the banned list are completely arbitrary.
Here is an example. Let's go with the premise that we are claiming that we are looking and wanting to see the best "natural" athletes compete, however they were born.
Ok, well then, why is it that some people are allowed to take some allergy medication, that will either allow them to race, or not? Yet, somebody who has a undetermined pituitary problem and can't maintain a 100ng/mL testosterone level naturally, has to just suffer and isn't allowed to at least take something so they can get up in the morning, train, eat, live a normal life, and maintain a level of let's just say between 300-700ng/mL by taking extraneous testosterone?
Some riders, if they can't take their allergy medication, have to entirely pull out of a race and are now unable to compete. Matt Goss was a fine example the other day when his domestique went back to the car, dropped his allergy medication/lost it, and Goss flipped out, couldn't eve ride/compete any longer. It is a similar circumstance I would take that to mean it is absolutely a performance enhancing drug, due to the fact, they can't even go out and compete to their bodies unexplained reaction to external elements in life causing demise and health issues.
Same for asthma medication, doesn't even require a TUE...that is completely acceptable to take. To make some claim it isn't performance enhancing is complete ridiculous. If you can't get on a bike and go ride, that isn't performing. You take a hit of your allergy meds/asthma inhaler, and all of the sudden, you can go out and compete ride...how is that not enhancing performance in some shape or form?
Testosterone of course has a stigma based off ignorance and stupidity perpetrated by most people that somehow if you take extraneous testosterone and your level is say 600-700ng/mL, well below the max limit naturally found of nearly 1200ng/mL, you are some kind of "roider" and are now have some completely unfounded/unproven advantage all of the sudden.
In the example of allergy medication, people have similar symptoms, poor quality of life, can't live and act just plain normal, not talking superhuman...due to an unknown and entirely unexplainable natural occurring phenomenon.
Ban it all, or be sensible/reasonable and apply the exceptions fairly.