A 
		
				
				
			
		Anonymous
Guest
Tibber said:So quit teaching and open a business and, mosty importantly, QUIT COMPLANING ABOUT A PROFESSION YOU CHOSE
Hey douchebag, read the whole thread. That was covered.
Tibber said:So quit teaching and open a business and, mosty importantly, QUIT COMPLANING ABOUT A PROFESSION YOU CHOSE
Tibber said:So quit teaching and open a business and, mosty importantly, QUIT COMPLANING ABOUT A PROFESSION YOU CHOSE
Thoughtforfood said:Teaching a class and being responsible for 180+ people every day, (people who are adolescent, hate going to school, 30% of whom only want to disrupt what you are trying to do,- had a wise old teacher tell me one time that out of a class of 30, 10 will hate you, 10 will love you, and 10 don't care, and that my job was to keep the 10 that don't care from hanging out with the 10 that hated me- all of whom owe you work daily, many of whom fail to hand it in, meaning you have to continue to to work with them because your job depends on it, then attend any after school activities you are involved in (mine was coaching cross country and track-which I received a whopping $800 for the year for the extra 15 hours per week I spent doing that, then you have to grade everything that does come in, log all of that into a system of grading, attend teacher's meetings once per week, 5-10 parent conferences each week, Department meetings once per week, and probably 1-2 other meetings per week...well you get the point) is very different from teaching a lesson, and in now way constitutes knowledge of what it is like to be a teacher.
Tell you what, go to a local business that has around 150 employees and ask the owner if he/she would still do their job for $35,000 (counting in benefits) if he/she were unable to effectively discipline his workforce because he couldn't fire them regardless of how they behave up to and including threats to his/her life. Because a teacher performs the functions of a business owner under the conditions I just described.
Thoughtforfood said:And the conditions into which they were brought (unasked mind you) are deplorable and you didn't live through them, but you feel that you can sweepingly judge them? Yes, they deserve to bear the responsibility for their crimes, but failing to understand the complexity of the situation that brought them there does nothing to help solve it. Building more prisons is one answer, but a poor one, and one that will eventually bite a civilization in the a$$. Changing just one kid is worth the effort because generally, those are the kind who might just change a couple of others later in life. Especially if the pay warranted their joining the ranks of teachers.
CentralCaliBike said:Yes, I feel that I can judge them - I know many were not brought into great living conditions, but in some situations they do have family members who seem to have figured out how to succeed in the same environment.
As a former teacher I cannot believe that you did not come into contact with students who caused yourself (and their fellow students) a great deal of concern for personal safety.
Having spent a number of years looking at every record available (including lengthy interviews with family and friends) of extremely violent individuals, I believe that significant (but not complete) responsibility lies with the home environment, but that does not absolve the young criminal for their actions - they still know when you pull a trigger someone is likely to die, someone will have a family who will be in pain, someone will no longer exist.
CentralCaliBike said:Yes, I feel that I can judge them - I know many were not brought into great living conditions, but in some situations they do have family members who seem to have figured out how to succeed in the same environment.
As a former teacher I cannot believe that you did not come into contact with students who caused yourself (and their fellow students) a great deal of concern for personal safety.
CentralCaliBike said:Having spent a number of years looking at every record available (including lengthy interviews with family and friends) of extremely violent individuals, I believe that significant (but not complete) responsibility lies with the home environment, but that does not absolve the young criminal for their actions - they still know when you pull a trigger someone is likely to die, someone will have a family who will be in pain, someone will no longer exist.
Cash05458 said:"Certainly I had students who fit that description. I had one who was extremely intelligent (never came to class, but somehow always got A's on tests) and very up front about the fact that he made more money in a week than I did in a month by selling drugs."
But of course...they are brought up in a system that tells them that money equals life and more of it...that unless you are rich, you are a big *** loser...they hear this everyday...so of course they are going to do this...it is our system...
Cash05458 said:"Certainly I had students who fit that description. I had one who was extremely intelligent (never came to class, but somehow always got A's on tests) and very up front about the fact that he made more money in a week than I did in a month by selling drugs."
But of course...they are brought up in a system that tells them that money equals life and more of it...that unless you are rich, you are a big *** loser...they hear this everyday...so of course they are going to do this...it is our system...
CentralCaliBike said:I have some friends who spent a number of years in Russia - they tell me that our mafia primary school kids in comparison to what they have over there - the Russian mafia is extremely materialistic in a society that was supposed to consider capitalism the most evil in existence.
Cash05458 said:Methinks the Russian mafia learned a few things from Western Capitalism...my god, think about it a little would you Central...
CentralCaliBike said:Are you saying that crooks and criminals had to learn bad behavior from businessmen
Look back over history, bullies have been around a lot longer than Western banking systems. Mafias and street gang behavior is capitalistic in that they are focused on making money - but they are also interested in causing those around them to fear them which is not a foundational requirement for Capitalism.
More likely politicians. Not to mention sports stars, rappers, etc.CentralCaliBike said:Are you saying that crooks and criminals had to learn bad behavior from businessmen.
Alpe d'Huez said:More likely politicians. Not to mention sports stars, rappers, etc.

Exactly my point. It is very hard to have any impact on their home environments, so all the efforts should go to education.CentralCaliBike said:Having spent a number of years looking at every record available (including lengthy interviews with family and friends) of extremely violent individuals, I believe that significant (but not complete) responsibility lies with the home environment
That's not an excuse at all...CentralCaliBike said:We certainly have a culture of criminal activity in the US (I know it is not just here as I have seen gang pictures from kids in Europe) but criminal culture is as old as human history - not that the politicians, rappers, and sports stars are helping set a better example.
Buffalo Soldier said:Exactly my point. It is very hard to have any impact on their home environments, so all the efforts should go to education.
The biggest problem, i think, lies in an anti-school culture, caused by an feeling of anomie, that will only get bigger if you give up on them at school. Self-fulfilling prophecy once again...
Bala Verde said:
I'm not exactly sure why you're posting this stuff? Do you really think we need to go back to the days of low or no pollution controls? Or that everyone who thinks climate changes is an issue to be concerned with wants to destroy all industry? Or that the only scientific reports that are objective about climate change are those from the "right"? I don't get it.CentralCaliBike said:Interesting article on global cooling - looks like we have two to three decades of much cooler weather ahead
Alpe d'Huez said:I'm not exactly sure why you're posting this stuff? Do you really think we need to go back to the days of low or no pollution controls? Or that everyone who thinks climate changes is an issue to be concerned with wants to destroy all industry? Or that the only scientific reports that are objective about climate change are those from the "right"? I don't get it.
 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		
 
				
		