Re:
movingtarget said:
The industrial city of Mariupol is close to the disputed zone. The train line is still open but the port is important to Ukraine. Putin just testing the waters for the response from the West or something else in mind ?
i dont know who was testing whose waters...
since its rather useless to take either side's versions in search of what really happened, yesterday i watched a couple 'round-tables' on france 24, DW and CGTN...some experts explained that based on the existing international and bilateral agreements, BOTH can claim a point in terms of the right of passage/denying the right through that strait. the ukrainians did NOT need the explicit russian
permission to pass, but rather just
inform them. thus the russian claim of having received no advance request, even if true, is a weak argument. at the same time, the russians had the right to inspect any ship that would stray into their territorial waters. particularly at a time when the ukrainians threatened to blow up the new bridge across the strait. and the ukrainians DID pass into their territorial waters as it appears w/o ill intent.
the dog was in the uki reaction to a warning to stop. mind you, these were ukrainian
warships, not some civil boats. for a military vessel to stop on the demands of another military, it is a big deal where the national pride, military discipline and common sense DONT mix well.
it is my understanding that the ukrainians counted on their ships military status to feel they weren't bound by the russian military orders. IOW, the ukis
planned to ignore a warning if issued. as such, this element i would NOT call a ukrainian provocation, but knowing the tension between the 2 and the fact the russians were stopping ALL ships under the threatened bridge, i'd say the chance of the russian stop order was was near 100%. ignoring the risk of such an order was imo either foolish or a deliberate plan. i would stick with a deliberate plan.
what happened then was a common game of chicken. several verbal warnings, followed by shooting in the air were ignored. though the ukis reckoned that the russians scared of international condemnation and sanctions
wont DARE to shoot. the ukrainian gamble was called and we know the rest. note, despite having plenty of means, the uki vessels wisely did not shoot back. they knew they'd become fish meal if they did.
now you tell me what vlad was up to vs the uki prez gamble ? and to start with, why was martial law declared
this time when only 20 bullets flew and NOT during the hot action earlier when 20,000 ukrainians died :Question:
the answer was provided by 2 american analysts on france 24 - he needed the martial law to suppress the coming election, stay in power and to boost his rating.
a different light than you read in the western msm...isn't it ?