World Politics

Page 655 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
....file under...the future could become so bright I may have to wear danger glasses....and yeah its an old story but things haven't got more better...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Petrodollars leave world markets for first time in 18 years - BNP


By Chris Vellacott

LONDON Mon Nov 3, 2014 10:07am EST

Nov 3 (Reuters) - Energy-exporting countries are set to pull their "petrodollars" out of world markets this year for the first time in almost two decades, according to a study by BNP Paribas.

Driven by this year's drop in oil prices, the shift is likely to cause global market liquidity to fall, the study showed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

....from... http://www.reuters.com/article/2014...edName=rbssFinancialServicesAndRealEstateNews

....and now for some real fun read....you'll die laughing....really...

http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/01...evenues-behind-the-feds-projected-rate-hikes/

Cheers
 
Jun 15, 2009
8,529
1
0
Told ya guys: Protection works. Its just a question who has the power to be protected. So who is it? The banksters, yet again.
Mega criminal Draghi (yep, the one who worked... err... still works for Goldman Sachs and putsched his way into the EZB leader) saves the shareholders of banks and the rich customers deposits. And the most disgusting part? He lies without a move to all of us europeans: Saying he wants to stop deflation! Those mafia psychos have no spine. They kill us inch by inch with rotten to the core politics and financial theft.

The complete truth behind the Draghi lie:
http://www.egon-w-kreutzer.de/002/PaD032015.html
 
Jun 10, 2013
9,240
5
17,495
I've posted it before here, will post it again. It has been officially stated by the UN back in 2006 already, but obviously nobody gave a crap: In order to fight climate change (and hunger as well), it is imperative for the world population to switch towards a vegan diet. It's time to have some initiative.

http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.htm
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jun/02/un-report-meat-free-diet
http://www.worldwatch.org/node/549
http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6294
http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-food/global-warming/
 
Mar 17, 2009
2,295
0
0
BigMac said:
I've posted it before here, will post it again. It has been officially stated by the UN back in 2006 already, but obviously nobody gave a crap: In order to fight climate change (and hunger as well), it is imperative for the world population to switch towards a vegan diet. It's time to have some initiative.

http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.htm
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jun/02/un-report-meat-free-diet
http://www.worldwatch.org/node/549
http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6294
http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-food/global-warming/

you can still eat steak, right?
 
Jun 10, 2013
9,240
5
17,495
patricknd said:
you can still eat steak, right?

From a strictly environmentalist veganism pov, yes, once in a lifetime. Though it beats me why you would.

Hugh Januss said:
I'd rather walk to the market to buy a steak than drive there to buy vegetables. Won't that help?:p

Nope. The destructive impact of livestock farming on the environment is much superior to that of all of transportation. Better if you do both.
 
Mar 17, 2009
2,295
0
0
BigMac said:
From a strictly environmentalist veganism pov, yes, once in a lifetime. Though it beats me why you would.



Nope. The destructive impact of livestock farming on the environment is much superior to that of all of transportation. Better if you do both.

I think I'll keep working on reducing my broccoli footprint instead. I like being part of the solution. :D
 
And so now, what are the United Nations ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/08/world/08nations.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

UNITED NATIONS — On screen, two senior United Nations officials in Bosnia are arguing about firing Kathy Bolkovac, an American police officer battling to stop peacekeepers from both trafficking in young women and frequenting the brothels where they became indentured prostitutes.

Stephen Lovekin/Getty Images
Kathy Bolkovac
Enlarge This Image

Dieu Nalio Chery/Associated Press
An 18-year-old man who claims he was sexually abused by Uruguayan peacekeepers lies on his bed at his home in Port Salut, Haiti.
“It is a point of honor for me that the U.N. is not remembered for raping the very people we must protect,” says Madeleine Rees, a spirited human rights advocate played by Vanessa Redgrave.

“Those girls are *****s of war,” growls the male bureaucrat heading the United Nations mission. “It happens; I will not dictate for morality.”

Ms. Rees, the director of the human rights office in Sarajevo from 1998 to 2006, said that dispute in the movie “The Whistleblower,” recently released in the United States, was lifted almost verbatim from a running argument she had around 2001.

A decade later, a string of sex scandals from Bosnia to the Democratic Republic of Congo to Haiti involving peacekeeping missions has forced the United Nations to change the way it handles accusations of trafficking, rape and related crimes. But the issue still bedevils the institution — a point underscored by the skirmishing among senior United Nations officials over whether to embrace the movie or try to ignore it.

The issue has certainly not gone away. This week, hundreds of Haitians protested in support of an 18-year-old who said he was sexually assaulted by peacekeepers from Uruguay on a United Nations base, eliciting a furious rebuke from Haiti’s president and an apology from Uruguay.

The United Nations has focused serious attention on addressing sexual crimes among the more than 120,000 personnel it has deployed in 16 peacekeeping missions globally, including widespread training. But the question that diplomats, advocates and even some United Nations officials ask is why the efforts still lag in terms of investigating accusations and, most important, making sure those who send troops and contractors abroad hold them accountable.

Human rights experts and some member states fault the United Nations for leaving too much of the job of enforcing its “zero tolerance” policy announced in 2003 to the countries contributing troops. Individual cases and any disciplinary action are rarely made public.

“They never come up with actual facts; they never come up with actual cases,” Ms. Bolkovac said.

She won a wrongful dismissal case in 2003 against a subsidiary of Virginia-based DynCorp International, which was contracted by the State Department to provide police officers for the United Nations peacekeeping force in Bosnia. But Ms. Bolkovac says she has never been hired by another peacekeeping mission. (DynCorp issued a statement noting that “The Whistleblower” was a work of fiction and that new owners had since enacted their own zero tolerance policy.)

United Nations officials brandish the statistics published on the organization’s peacekeeping Web site as evidence of transparency. The numbers, whose source is somewhat vague, indicate that cases dropped from 108 substantiated accusations of sexual exploitation and abuse in 2007 to 85 in 2008, then to 63 in 2009, 33 last year and just 5 so far in 2011.

But more than 200 such accusations remain unresolved, and the United Nations annual report on such crimes for 2010 noted that sexual activity with minors and nonconsensual sex represented more than half of reported accusations, little changed since 2008. Cases have come to light where peacekeepers paid children $1 or with candy to make a rape seem like prostitution.

Finally, efforts to gather information from troop contributors about legal or disciplinary action are often ignored. The United Nations got answers roughly a quarter of the time, or 88 responses from 333 queries sent, since 2007, according to its figures.

Senior officials defend the numbers as improving, and argue that publicly shaming member states would make finding peacekeeping troops more difficult. “Going into a blame and shame approach is counterproductive because this requires a mind-set change,” said Susanna Malcorra, head of the logistics end of peacekeeping.

Activists and some diplomats condemn the United Nations as timid, with internal policing particularly weak under Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. Mr. Ban waged an extended feud over hiring with the head of internal oversight before she left in 2010, leaving dozens of investigator jobs empty. Senior officials admit that its investigators have the mandate to do more to track sexual abuse cases.

The United Nations pays $1,024 a month per soldier, making peacekeeping a profitable venture for many poorer nations. In June, member states voted themselves a bonus of roughly $100 per soldier per month, costing $85 million, for the coming year. The United Nations lost an opportunity by not hinging the bonuses on better cooperation, advocates contend.

“Member states are not reliable enough to do a good job on their own, especially in the early stages of a military investigation,” said Prince Zeid Raad Zeid al-Hussein, the Jordanian ambassador and the author of a damning study of sexual exploitation in peacekeeping in 2005 as special adviser on the issue under the previous secretary general. Mr. Ban never filled the post.

Member states rejected the study’s recommendations to establish a coordinated, nimble investigation and discipline process. Soldiers serving the United Nations are subject to their own countries’ military justice. The only wrist slap often faced by contractors is being sent home, because they enjoy immunity as United Nations employees.

Soldiers linked to crimes are often repatriated. In April, 16 peacekeepers from Benin were sent home from Ivory Coast — more than a year after Save the Children U.K. found that the soldiers traded food for sex with poor, underage girls. More than 100 troops from Sri Lanka were sent home from Haiti in 2007 because of widespread accusations of sex with minors.

In many cases, however, the final outcome remains a mystery.

“The U.N. is not even a player in the investigation, doesn’t know the evidence and has no way to follow up with the way the military decides to deal with this issue,” Prince Zeid said. “We, the member states, have by and large failed to do what I had hoped we would do.”

The State Department’s 2010 report on human trafficking criticized the United Nations, saying, “No comprehensive information is available on the number of cases of disciplinary action.”

A leaked memo from the United Nations human rights office in New York reflected the divisions over openness. In a lengthy discussion about how to address “The Whistleblower,” Kiyotaka Akasaka, the head of public information, and Patricia O’Brien, the top lawyer, argued for playing down the movie and certainly not screening it at the United Nations headquarters, the memo said.

But the executive director of the newly created agency U.N. Women, Michelle Bachelet, the former president of Chile, argued for a more open approach, it said, along with several others.

Mr. Ban wrote to the film’s director, Larysa Kondracki, saying he had watched the movie with his senior advisers and was “pained” by it. “Your film points to one area where our work left questions behind,” he said.

A public screening will be held at the United Nations soon, he told her.

----------

A bit of a taint, isn't it? :D
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
....speaking of festering sores that could get worse...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Netanyahu ‘spat in our face,’ White House officials say

Source: Times Of Israel

Netanyahu ‘spat in our face,’ White House officials say
US sources says PM will pay price for spat over Congress address; Obama said to have asked him to tone down pro-sanctions rhetoric; Wash. Post: Kerry’s enthusiasm for defending Israel waning


The White House’s outrage over Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plan to speak before Congress in March — a move he failed to coordinate with the administration — began to seep through the diplomatic cracks on Friday, with officials telling Haaretz the Israeli leader had “spat” in President Barack Obama’s face.

“We thought we’ve seen everything,” the newspaper quoted an unnamed senior US official as saying. “But Bibi managed to surprise even us.

“There are things you simply don’t do. He spat in our face publicly and that’s no way to behave. Netanyahu ought to remember that President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price,” he said.

Officials in Washington said that the “chicken****” epithet — with which an anonymous administration official branded Netanyahu several months ago — was mild compared to the language used in the White House when news of Netanyahu’s planned speech came in.


Read more: http://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-spat-in-our-face-white-house-officials-say/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cheers
 
Apr 15, 2014
4,254
2,341
18,680
FoxxyBrown1111 said:
Draghi the Euro mobster...
Now we lose even against the Kenya Shilling. You guys heard it right: The Euro loses against the Kenya Shilling :eek:...

http://www.finanzen.net/devisen/euro-kenia_schilling-kurs

Oh those evil euro gangsters in Bruxlles who brought us all that shit politics and financial suicide. Spineless ragtag that obeys big business and cares nothing about their people...

Do you understand anything about economics?
What does 'losing' to any coin tell you? Do you think that Kenya's coin should continuously devaluate against all major currencies - just because, er what? Apart from not sounding knowledgeable, you also sound racist.
 
Aug 4, 2011
3,647
0
0
Why are flags flying at half mast around Whitehall for the head of the Saudi regime that sentences a blogger to 1000 lashes

Politics is just a pathetic media front with no real influence that lets the very rich and powerful to carry on with their business.
 
Jun 15, 2009
8,529
1
0
Jagartrott said:
Do you understand anything about economics?
What does 'losing' to any coin tell you? Do you think that Kenya's coin should continuously devaluate against all major currencies - just because, er what? Apart from not sounding knowledgeable, you also sound racist.

I just posted the consequences of Draghis newest stunt yesterday... I mean you shall read it before blaming me.

Nowadays everything is racist?
OK, let me enlighten you: The Kenya Shilling is a very soft currency. The inflation rate per year is circa 10 percent. The economy is weak. I was there 13 times all over the country, how many times did you??

If facts are racist. So be it. If I criticise the islam, that is racist. So be it. If I criticise the anti doping of any country, I am racist against all people there. So be it.

But you know what? Using this "argument" too often weakens it. Imagine you meet a real racist. How you gonna call him? Über-Über-Mega-Super-Duper-Racist?
It is getting ridicoulous. If you cant take the truth, so be it. But don´t insult my brain for blaming me to see the hard consequences of the wrong euro politiccs in finance and society. There is no discussing around it: The EU bureucrats sacrifice the original nations inch by inch... Hard racist fact.

Oh, BTW: We never had the chance to vote against the Euro, ESM, ESF, Maastricht, EU commisars, and all the other bull that turns Europes origin countries from democracies to one big EU dictatorship.
 
Apr 15, 2014
4,254
2,341
18,680
If you look at the longer term graph of eur-shilling, you'll see that the exchange rate was below 100 for prolonged periods, even when Europe was doing OK economically (e.g. 2006-2007). It doesn't look very different than, say, a euro-dollar graph. You're just cherry-picking a graph to support an unclear stance, making it sound if Kenya is the most *** country in the world - and *even* to them we are 'losing'.

Let's get the facts straight here: a euro that is worth less could strengthen Europe's exports. That isn't a drama. Look at where the US is now - look at where it's currency was some time ago - and know that some politicians there were doom-and-gloom profets regarding QE. The facts are just not in your favour here.
 
Jagartrott said:
Apart from not sounding knowledgeable, you also sound racist.

You are only just noticing it?

I mean I'm very careful before using such accusation as I had it so many times against me, including on this forum but a guy who implies that the Turks carry in themselves the plague of rape, I don't really know what to call that. Just like his 'little friend' referring to the Muslim community as a 'tribe'. As long as words have meaning, a tribe means an ethnic, so refers to a race. 100% racist and I so much wish I had never seen that.


Worst thing of all is that I am also 100% anti-EU but I already was a long time ago when it still was politically uncorrect to be.
 
Jul 23, 2009
5,412
19
17,510
blutto said:
....speaking of festering sores that could get worse...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Netanyahu ‘spat in our face,’ White House officials say

Source: Times Of Israel

Netanyahu ‘spat in our face,’ White House officials say
US sources says PM will pay price for spat over Congress address; Obama said to have asked him to tone down pro-sanctions rhetoric; Wash. Post: Kerry’s enthusiasm for defending Israel waning


The White House’s outrage over Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plan to speak before Congress in March — a move he failed to coordinate with the administration — began to seep through the diplomatic cracks on Friday, with officials telling Haaretz the Israeli leader had “spat” in President Barack Obama’s face.

“We thought we’ve seen everything,” the newspaper quoted an unnamed senior US official as saying. “But Bibi managed to surprise even us.

“There are things you simply don’t do. He spat in our face publicly and that’s no way to behave. Netanyahu ought to remember that President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price,” he said.

Officials in Washington said that the “chicken****” epithet — with which an anonymous administration official branded Netanyahu several months ago — was mild compared to the language used in the White House when news of Netanyahu’s planned speech came in.


Read more: http://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-spat-in-our-face-white-house-officials-say/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cheers

Fair is fair. Having the administration tell congress anything in advance is a waste of time anyway. They can read about what the POTUS does in the 'Post'.

I think Bibi would be smart to remember to not **** where he eats.
 
Jun 15, 2009
8,529
1
0
Jagartrott said:
If you look at the longer term graph of eur-shilling, you'll see that the exchange rate was below 100 for prolonged periods, even when Europe was doing OK economically (e.g. 2006-2007). It doesn't look very different than, say, a euro-dollar graph. You're just cherry-picking a graph to support an unclear stance, making it sound if Kenya is the most *** country in the world - and *even* to them we are 'losing'.

Let's get the facts straight here: a euro that is worth less could strengthen Europe's exports. That isn't a drama. Look at where the US is now - look at where it's currency was some time ago - and know that some politicians there were doom-and-gloom profets regarding QE. The facts are just not in your favour here.

It is absolute logical that the EUR gains over the KySH always. Why? Because they (Ky) have a higher inflation... much higher. But if the EU expands their fiat money to save the bankster shareholders and protect rich bank deposists, you start losing against a 3rd world currency (yes, yes, I am a financial racist by telling what it is). And that is alarming!

The exports get cheaper yes, but the (to import) raw materials get more expensive. It´s a zero sum game for business, but it´s lose-lose for the average european union worker. His interest rates from savings fall below the rates of money expandation, products prices from outer countries rise, holidays outside of Europe get more expensive... and in the end inflation will rise heavily. The final coffin. The lifes destroyed. The Euro becoming soft like some kind of Simbabwe Dollar. All happened before, here in Europe...
 
Jun 15, 2009
8,529
1
0
Echoes said:
You are only just noticing it?

I mean I'm very careful before using such accusation as I had it so many times against me, including on this forum but a guy who implies that the Turks carry in themselves the plague of rape.

Guess you mean me... You are very smart... not.
I posted official statistics of who raped in a certain german city. If you don´t like the numbers, do something to protect our lives instead of personally insulting many posters here.

Nobody said people from a certain country. All we say is the islam is dangerous, inclusive pointing out hard facts (like a overhelming number of quran suras hailing war, misogyny, and oppression > leading to failed states where they live by the Scharia; major problems with imigrants & "refugees" from islamic countries; "holy war" heineous terrorist attacks; women abuse, and more). You can insult the messengers as racists all day long, but you can´t wash away hard facts. Simple as that.

The old lefties problem: Having no arguments > attacking others as racists and nazis. The lowest of the low...
 
Apr 15, 2014
4,254
2,341
18,680
FoxxyBrown1111 said:
The exports get cheaper yes, but the (to import) raw materials get more expensive. It´s a zero sum game for business, but it´s lose-lose for the average european union worker. His interest rates from savings fall below the rates of money expandation, products prices from outer countries rise, holidays outside of Europe get more expensive... and in the end inflation will rise heavily. The final coffin. The lifes destroyed. The Euro becoming soft like some kind of Simbabwe Dollar. All happened before, here in Europe...

Of course it's not a zero-sum game. Jeez.
Saving getting less interesting - would stimulate expenditure and the economy. Tourism to outside EU less interesting (not a problem for the EU) - but tourism inside EU will get stimulated (read any news reports on the Swiss tourism industry lately?).

And the Zimbabwe dollar, really?
If you stopped talking in a continuous stream of hyperboles, perhaps some people would take you seriously.
 
Jun 15, 2009
8,529
1
0
Jagartrott said:
Of course it's not a zero-sum game. Jeez.
Saving getting less interesting - would stimulate expenditure and the economy. Tourism to outside EU less interesting (not a problem for the EU) - but tourism inside EU will get stimulated (read any news reports on the Swiss tourism industry lately?).

And the Zimbabwe dollar, really?
If you stopped talking in a continuous stream of hyperboles, perhaps some people would take you seriously.

OFC it´s a zero sum game (ok that is technical not 100% correct, because of interest). The question is who gains, who loses....
That the economy would get stimulated is a wish by Draghi (or better say plain lie). To get it stimulated, it would mean the banksters had to give more credits. Are they doing it? Doubtful, especially with Basel II. Will the banksters speculate with the new found money? You bet. Stock markets already searching for new heights. Why? Because the ever expanding money must go somewhere. Will the average guy gain? OFC not. He isn´t shit on with all the new money. It´s all about saving the banksters and rich deposits. You don´t have to believe me. Soros just said it yesterday in Davos "Now the rich will get richer." Still don´t trust me? Read the link I posted. It´s described from A to Z who gains, who loses with the latest Draghi stunt. Hint: It´s not me, and it´s not you... That old basterd from Goldman Sachs. :mad:

Finally what you think expanding money does? Hint: It goes into investements. And now; do prices rise or fall? ... ;)
 
Jul 4, 2009
9,666
0
0
....file under how the GMO "culture" is just absolutely peachy keen and like almost a gift from gawd...

http://farmwars.info/?p=13829

....does anyone think there is really a connection btwn Roundup and high cancer rates or is that just conspiracy stuff from crazed liberal/socalist/communistical types ( I mean Monsanto and their ilk are pillars of good honest business practices who have a long history of good, nay saintly, works that will guarantee them a place in heaven )....hmmm, maybe we should get that scientist of all corporate trades, Richard Siegmund Lindzen to comment on it...because he is such a straight arrow with a resume to prove it...

Cheers
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
long gone from everyone's radars, the situation in ukraine appears to move from bad to worse by the hour... the civilians in 2 major cities are now being slaughtered daily by the dozen via the use of artillery and the multiple launch rocket systems.

..i became thoroughly disoriented trying to follow the warring sides reports. they are reporting the exact opposite of each other - it is almost humorous if it was not so tragic.

then i switched only to reading al jazeera as they seem not to care playing sides. they said the porky (poroshenko) is cutting short now his 2nd trip abroad (1st was davos and now the saudi funeral), b/c his army was pushed back from several towns and the donets airport.

the rebels leader said he's done talking to porky and has declared a wide offensive.

looks like the chaps decided to warm up things in mid winter :rolleyes:
 
Apr 15, 2014
4,254
2,341
18,680
FoxxyBrown1111 said:
OFC it´s a zero sum game (ok that is technical not 100% correct, because of interest). The question is who gains, who loses....
That the economy would get stimulated is a wish by Draghi (or better say plain lie). To get it stimulated, it would mean the banksters had to give more credits. Are they doing it? Doubtful, especially with Basel II. Will the banksters speculate with the new found money? You bet. Stock markets already searching for new heights. Why? Because the ever expanding money must go somewhere. Will the average guy gain? OFC not. He isn´t shit on with all the new money. It´s all about saving the banksters and rich deposits. You don´t have to believe me. Soros just said it yesterday in Davos "Now the rich will get richer." Still don´t trust me? Read the link I posted. It´s described from A to Z who gains, who loses with the latest Draghi stunt. Hint: It´s not me, and it´s not you... That old basterd from Goldman Sachs. :mad:

Finally what you think expanding money does? Hint: It goes into investements. And now; do prices rise or fall? ... ;)
You're mixing up two things. I was talking to you about how a currency that lost some value can actually be a good thing. It's not a zero sum game. If you're raw material costs make up 20%, and labour 60%, how can that be zero? Have you heard CEOs of euro-firms depending on export about the euro weakening?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.