Why do you so often say crap like this? Of course you wouldn't enjoy seeing Novo Nordisk at the Tour.
Otoh, several people picking Pithie as a potential winner for CEGORR; now that was too crazy for him...
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Why do you so often say crap like this? Of course you wouldn't enjoy seeing Novo Nordisk at the Tour.
Surely we've established by this point that that poster is either a troll or mentally challenged? In both cases, no point in trying to reason with them.Why do you so often say crap like this? Of course you wouldn't enjoy seeing Novo Nordisk at the Tour.
Surely we've established by this point that that poster is either a troll or mentally challenged? In both cases, no point in trying to reason with them.
Having Novo Nordisk ride a GT would at least be a good story, but they would of course not be anything more than pack fodder.
I don't think it would be a good story. If they did have a level worthy of participation, sure, but they don't.
It wouldn't kill me to see a one-off appearance by a team that hadn't qualified on merit. I wouldn't like to see it in the Tour de France though, unless they increased the number of teams by one for that particular edition, so they didn't take that spot away from other teams. That said, NN has probably been around for so long now that it's too late to invite them in such a way. But still my enjoyment of and rating of a GT are not determined by the level of the worst team in it.
You can go back and watch the 2004 Tour with a special eye on the RAGT Semences team.
Probably neither. I have a more specific category in mind, but whether one wants to label him or not, I think it's better to ignore him than react with animosity to what are fairly innocuous posts.Surely we've established by this point that that poster is either a troll or mentally challenged? In both cases, no point in trying to reason with them.
In recent times, I more and more take pleasure in watching the „underdogs“ achieving amazing things.Why do you so often say crap like this? Of course you wouldn't enjoy seeing Novo Nordisk at the Tour.
Yeah, after almost 27 years of following pro cycling closely, I every now and then could feel at least a little bit mentally challenged… Festina and Fuentes cases took their tolls…Surely we've established by this point that that poster is either a troll or mentally challenged? In both cases, no point in trying to reason with them.
I know Novo Nordisk would have a hard time at the Tour, but could bring a few riders to Paris… Plus, create awareness for their core issue, diabetes in highest level endurance sports…
Yeah, RAGT had a hard time, and actually only was there for joining the breakaways in the flatter stages.You can go back and watch the 2004 Tour with a special eye on the RAGT Semences team.
Dude, Calzati had 2 top 15s in mass sprints!!! (14th & 15th).You can go back and watch the 2004 Tour with a special eye on the RAGT Semences team.
Worth pointing out that they somehow had a TT1 license in 2004, the top class at the time. The current system is far from perfect, but thank god that there is some kind of merit to the WT license allocation now so that that kind of *** isn't possible anymore.Dude, Calzati had 2 top 15s in mass sprints!!! (14th & 15th).
Otherwise they actually had a rider in the top 50 on some of the harder stages and their best GC rider managed to get a top 75.
The only good thing was that they managed to get with 8 out of 9 rider to Paris.
Why single out that year? RAGT was just the Jean Delatour team with a new sponsor and they had won stages in the Tour the two previous years so they more than delivered on their invites on several occasions.You can go back and watch the 2004 Tour with a special eye on the RAGT Semences team.
Why single out that year? RAGT was just the Jean Delatour team with a new sponsor and they had won stages in the Tour the two previous years so they more than delivered on their invites on several occasions.
RAGT even fielded a general classification favorite in Christophe Rinero!Dude, Calzati had 2 top 15s in mass sprints!!! (14th & 15th).
Otherwise they actually had a rider in the top 50 on some of the harder stages and their best GC rider managed to get a top 75.
The only good thing was that they managed to get with 8 out of 9 rider to Paris.
This basically.Honestly, regarding Novo Nordisk in the TdF; I'm not even sure it would be beneficial to their cause. Or if people would see them get their asses handed to them - and let's face it; they'd probably struggle even getting in the breakaways - and draw the conclusion that endurance sport and type 1 diabetes doesn't match.
I had totally forgotten RAGT Semences actually took part in the 2004 Tour de France, until to my surprise I read it on Wikipedia in 2014!I don't particularly recall RAGT Semences on that Tour, apart from Frederic Finot jumping in many breaks on sprint stages (though that memory could belong to his Jean Delatour tenure). However, based on the riders they fielded they weren't worse than last year Corratec (conti level) or Burgos BH on the first two years at Vuelta. The only difference is those two teams were extremely lucky to be gifted two winning breaks that somewhat distort their impact on the race.