i agree totally on this point but if Frei can dodge the bio passport for two years then only screw up due to not diluting appropriately i hope we can catch doping methods sooner, whether that can be achieved or not i cannot say
i accept the point you are making and yes testing everyone could get messy, but maybe that is necessary to promote cycling as a clean sport, the culture will not change if people are still getting away with doping.
i wouldn't expect anything less from the Guardian or Yahoo. The times have also stopped people from commenting but have found them to write about what Landis is saying. The BBC yesterday refused to make any comments on Armstrong, ithey only reported "Landis admitted he doped"!
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/more_sport/cycling/article7131886.ece
the times is showing that USADA have brought in the fed that busted the Balco ring, is this correct?
McQuaid had the chance to show a progressive stance on doping, instead he dropped a clanger. Comparing the WADA response, shows just how backward and insular the UCI is. How can cyclist's speak out about doping issues if this is thrown back at them?