Here ya go TTF . . . testing of years old biological sample done right resulting in a finding of doping and exclusion from the Tour . . . .
"
Under the World Anti-Doping Code, drug testers have the option of storing and re-examining old samples,
as long as there is a sufficient quantity to allow a follow-up - or B sample - test. "
http://www.velonews.com/article/94103/dekker-positive-for-epo
So why didn't the conspiring French journalists and bias Australian doctor go this route on the six year old samples??? Oh . . . I know . . . because their sleight of hand charade resulting in . . . Voila! . . . Armstrong doped . . . probably wouldn't have worked if they had done it according to some accepted standard such as . . . oh . . . "the World Anti-Doping Code" as in this case.
Armstrong is clean. No one has proved or provided any credible evidence otherwise.