Étoile de Bessèges 2025 February 5th - 9th

Page 10 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Oct 30, 2023
5,313
8,192
16,180
I might be an outlier here. But a race with local traffic in the middle of it just might be a good reason to avoid it
 
May 10, 2015
13,615
12,916
28,180
So there was an agreement made before the start between organizers and riders that there would be more moto's before the groups to make sure cars were stopped in advance (which usually happend with rolling road closures). Then a few kilometers into the race the break was forming. The break was not even 20 seconds ahead when a car came out of his driveway in between break and peloton. Apparently it was riding in the same direction as the riders. Peloton stopped (Ineos and Red Bull first) and immediately started to protest. 3 riders were assigned as representatives. De Bondt, Lazkano and Thomas. The first 2 voted to stop the race, Thomas wanted to restart. Apparently the jury didn't listen to that vote and they still decided to restart, which made a lot of riders mad.

There's some rumors that UCI points won't count for this race, but I haven't seen any official confirmation. If that's the case, there's just no point in continuing anyways, unless you're a contiteam who wants some TV time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Berniece and search
So there was an agreement made before the start between organizers and riders that there would be more moto's before the groups to make sure cars were stopped in advance (which usually happend with rolling road closures). Then a few kilometers into the race the break was forming. The break was not even 20 seconds ahead when a car came out of his driveway in between break and peloton. Apparently it was riding in the same direction as the riders. Peloton stopped (Ineos and Red Bull first) and immediately started to protest. 3 riders were assigned as representatives. De Bondt, Lazkano and Thomas. The first 2 voted to stop the race, Thomas wanted to restart. Apparently the jury didn't listen to that vote and they still decided to restart, which made a lot of riders mad.

There's some rumors that UCI points won't count for this race, but I haven't seen any official confirmation. If that's the case, there's just no point in continuing anyways, unless you're a contiteam who wants some TV time.
So given that with that size of gap it is inappropriate to have cars or motorbikes between the breakaway and the peloton, and given that some drivers are that arrogant/oblivious, is there anything the organisers could have done to prevent it? Whether it was in a 2.1 race or the Tour de France?
 
May 10, 2015
13,615
12,916
28,180
So given that with that size of gap it is inappropriate to have cars or motorbikes between the breakaway and the peloton, and given that some drivers are that arrogant/oblivious, is there anything the organisers could have done to prevent it? Whether it was in a 2.1 race or the Tour de France?

Today? I don't think so, yesterday is a different story. I assume most riders where just still pissed off about yesterday. But even there it was an oblivious driver who apparently (according to the Gendarmerie) literally ignored a road block further up that road. I mean it's obviously a *** show.

Worst thing is that it might still get cancelled, and not because of the car problem, but because of the weather. Tomorrows weather is pretty insane. Cold and rain all day, possibily even snow on Mont Bouquet. Worst thing is that there might be some landslides danger wchich of course is an immediate cancellation of the race.
 
  • Like
Reactions: search
Apr 30, 2011
47,161
29,795
28,180
3 riders were assigned as representatives. De Bondt, Lazkano and Thomas. The first 2 voted to stop the race, Thomas wanted to restart. Apparently the jury didn't listen to that vote and they still decided to restart, which made a lot of riders mad.
Unless they can cite the governing rule-set of the sport where it mandates a simple majority of representatives of the riders with a veto on whether a race is allowed to continue for the willing participants, I don't see any reason why anyone should listen to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pastronef
May 10, 2015
13,615
12,916
28,180
Unless they can cite the governing rule-set of the sport where it mandates a simple majority of representatives of the riders with a veto on whether a race is allowed to continue for the willing participants, I don't see any reason why anyone should listen to them.

Thomas said that he doesn't know if it's binding. He thought there was an agreement between UCI and riders that if they do a majority vote it counts but he didn't know for sure. It would be weird to me if it would count honestly. Like if the majority doesn't want to race in bad weather they don't race?
 
May 10, 2015
13,615
12,916
28,180
Oier Lazkano sees red when about forty riders prepare to return to the fight. “Ok, ok… Bravo! You had an opportunity to change things, but you’re not taking it.” He is interrupted by Anthony Delaplace. “But get back to the bus you!” Tensions are rising. “Why don’t you wear your balls? Are you waiting for what to happen? For another death?”, we can hear in the distance.

:tearsofjoy:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tricycle Rider
May 10, 2015
13,615
12,916
28,180
That incident did of course cause a crash.

It did, mixed with riders who aren't looking out or slowing down properly, and Van Gils who is at the back of the peloton on his own not looking.

The person in the car btw apparently ignored a road block, and according to one source even ignored instructions from the gendarmerie. Is it dangerous? Yes, absolutely. Can the organizer do anything about morons on the road? Not really.

The only solution for this is more money (impossible) or more circuits, which means you're going away from what traditional cycling is, definitely if we talk about stage races. Or you know, you go to the desert. OneCycling will be happy with all this. I'm surprised I haven't see Plugge using this to promote his BS like a real politician.

In the first place I would recommend those WT teams to not go to this race in the future, no idea why they were all here when everyone knows Besseges is a dangerous race, even if we forget about the cars. Always very nervous and chaotic, always a lot of crashes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jul 10, 2014
14,994
25,994
28,180

GjNn4S9XkAAMAce
 
May 6, 2021
12,814
23,766
22,180
It did, mixed with riders who aren't looking out or slowing down properly, and Van Gils who is at the back of the peloton on his own not looking.

The person in the car btw apparently ignored a road block, and according to one source even ignored instructions from the gendarmerie. Is it dangerous? Yes, absolutely. Can the organizer do anything about French morons on the road? Not really.

The only solution for this is more money (impossible) or more circuits, which means you're going away from what traditional cycling is, definitely if we talk about stage races. Or you know, you go to the desert. OneCycling will be happy with all this. I'm surprised I haven't see Plugge using this to promote his BS like a real politician.

In the first place I would recommend those WT teams to not go to this race in the future, no idea why they were all here when everyone knows Besseges is a dangerous race, even if we forget about the cars. Always very nervous and chaotic, always a lot of crashes.
Did but in a more passive aggressive way;


At least it's the French he's having a go at this time rather than the Asians.
 
Quite lucky, considering the idiot cabbage yesterday.
That incident did of course cause a crash.
The situation of course shouldn't have arisen (and might have been more preventable than today's, but in both cases it was far more about an irresponsible driver than what race organisers had not done).
But the fall of Van Gils and those around him was a long way back in the peloton, and could have been related to any compression of the group.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,161
29,795
28,180
Not the same...
Either the action in question is legitimate or not. If it's not legitimate, then it's analogous to excusing terrorism if you sympathise with the motivation for it. If the action is legitimate, then you can argue that straightforwardly and you don't have to sympathise with the motivation for it.
 

zlev11

BANNED
Jan 23, 2011
2,734
3,146
17,180
honestly looking at the teams who left, we've barely lost anyone who could win the race overall. Carthy, Carapaz, Cattaneo, and Tratnik? screw em, we dont need em. should still be a pretty good race for the win the next two days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

zlev11

BANNED
Jan 23, 2011
2,734
3,146
17,180
wtf, what is the point of removing mont bouquet?

edit: i think that actually just says that the team cars wont be allowed up the climb
 

TRENDING THREADS