- Feb 20, 2010
- 33,087
- 15,314
- 28,180
Poor Audrey, that gap just got annihilated when Anna VDB got on the front, and obviously now she has Paladin in the gap too.
I dont think 2nd favorite is ridiculous considering his E-3 performance, his team and his results in Flanders so farIt was terrible clearly he should've been the #1 favorite.
But again, Asgreen was close to both riders all day. He was aware of all the facts you are, plus the additional fact that he’s stronger in a sprint at the end of a 6 hour, 260km race than you thought he was. He made the calculation that it was better to work with MvdP to make sure the chasers weren’t an issue, than to play cat and mouse and finish 5th in a 2-horse race (see; Criquielion 1987, and Bauer 2014, for 2 examples).Again, i was talking about the moment van Aert was still chasing solo, and van der Poel would have committed 100% regardless of Asgreen pulling. He could have played them out against each other.
This would not have been the scenario. Van der Poel would have kept riding to distance van Aert. Van Aert would have kept riding to bridge, especially knowing only van der Poel was riding in front. Asgreen would have been the laughing third. Good on him that he won, but assuming to beat van der Poel in a sprint was always a gamble.I mean he can decide not to take turns with van der Poel, ok they will slow down and everything comes together and maybe Senechal can win or more likely someone like Stuyven sneaks away. So his team's chances (but it's also a sport for individuals) would probably even be worse if he had refused.
Everything is a gamble. He made the correct choice - obviously.This would not have been the scenario. Van der Poel would have kept riding to distance van Aert. Van Aert would have kept riding to bridge, especially knowing only van der Poel was riding in front. Asgreen would have been the laughing third. Good on him that he won, but assuming to beat van der Poel in a sprint was always a gamble.
I agree, but you can also assess your odds while gambling and base a decision on that. He made the choice to gamble against the odds stacked up against him, so de facto, it wasn't a "smart" choice, so I can understand Logic's contention here. It was more a brave choice than a smart one, vindicated only because it paid off and he won. Kudos to him for being brave.Everything is a gamble. He made the correct choice - obviously.
I'm pretty sure sprinting against an even more fatigued van der Poel would have been less of a gamble. But clearly you think the fresher your rival, the worse he will sprint.Everything is a gamble. He made the correct choice - obviously.
Sagan beating Kristoff in a sprint for minor positions (15th). That's the biggest win you can get in De Ronde.
She lost 20" on the last climb, so I think she's more interested in making SD Worx chase and isolate van der Breggen and give Longo Borghini, van Dijk and Deignan a free ride in that group at this stage. Definitely think she expects she's not making it solo at this point.ACR should wait for Paladin, although I guess she's making it herself
Thank you. This is exactly why i mean.I agree, but you can also assess your odds while gambling and base a decision on that. He made the choice to gamble against the odds stacked up against him, so de facto, it wasn't a "smart" choice, so I can understand Logic's contention here. It was more a brave choice than a smart one, vindicated only because it paid off and he won. Kudos to him for being brave.
SD Worx isn't even doing the chasing unfortunately. Bike Exchange doing their work.She lost 20" on the last climb, so I think she's more interested in making SD Worx chase and isolate van der Breggen and give Longo Borghini, van Dijk and Deignan a free ride in that group at this stage. Definitely think she expects she's not making it solo at this point.
Has anybody expected Asgreen to wait for the sprint?
True, but then Grace Brown has been on great form so likely believes in herself here. And depending on the groups that they end up with, she can certainly trust her sprint against a fair few of those left.SD Worx isn't even doing the chasing unfortunately, Bike Exchange doing their work.
You can say that, but riding like Simon Gerrans isnt his nature, actually quite the opposite. Thats obvious to everyone who have seen the guy race. But secondly, riding like this, worst case is 2nd and best case is 1st. Taking the wheel sucking all-or-nothing approach and you can end up umpteenth instead of first off all securing the 2nd. Maybe 4 years down the road in the exact same situation with one more win under his belt (and a sense that he stands absolutely no chance in the sprint), he will do that. That will be the correct thing to do, but surely he thought he would stand a chance playing it this way and if everything went to ***, well, you still get 2nd and you get beat by a phenomenon and beat another.I agree, but you can also assess your odds while gambling and base a decision on that. He made the choice to gamble against the odds stacked up against him, so de facto, it wasn't a "smart" choice, so I can understand Logic's contention here. It was more a brave choice than a smart one, vindicated only because it paid off and he won. Kudos to him for being brave.
She's done, I think.Kopecky - problem at the base of Kwaremont for the biggest home hope? That's awful luck.
