106th Ronde van Vlaanderen: April 3rd, 2022

Page 49 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
In the end, Pogi himself has settled the matter, he is not mad. And I said Pogi made the mistake of not taking one last pull, but the great bluff is on VDP. Astute, yes, praiswothy depends on how you like to see a race end.

Option 1: Pogacar actually goes to the front in the final km.
Option 2: Van der Poel leads him out for a sprint.
Option 3: What actually happened.

Option 1 was up to Pogacar, so is VDP leading out Tadej the only "praiseworthy" (whatever the heck that is supposed to mean) option? Van der Poel hardly risked his own result (in the end he easily dusted the other 3) and crushed his rival. That seems the sort of racing to be admired.
 
Why is it an ugly style? Poga could have gone away if he wasnt happy with the approach. Each one used its strengths - Poga drilling on every hill and MvdP waiting for a short burst sprint.
Can we possibly say that MVP used his "approach" by hanging on to Pogi on the bergs, when he usually makes the moves. A clean two-up sprint between them would have been just.
 
Option 1: Pogacar actually goes to the front in the final km.
Option 2: Van der Poel leads him out for a sprint.
Option 3: What actually happened.

Option 1 was up to Pogacar, so is VDP leading out Tadej the only "praiseworthy" (whatever the heck that is supposed to mean) option? Van der Poel hardly risked his own result (in the end he easily dusted the other 3) and crushed his rival. That seems the sort of racing to be admired.
Option 1 for Pog. Option 2 for VDP. Option 3 major pussyfooting on the part of MVP.

PS. MVP was fortunate that at the moment he opened up his sprint, the other two came from behind and only disrupted Pogi's. True, in the end, it was Pogi's own fault, but I still think VDP's win was due to cunning rather than strength.
 
He slowed down to force Pog to the front or, if not, let the others come back. Right tactic, but ugly style after Pog made all the difference for him before.

I still don’t get it. He’s trying to win a race. He out-thought Pogacar and played the finale in a way that minimised his chance of losing. For a guy who usually wins just by being the strongest, I thought it was interesting to see him be calculating, clever and ruthless. He doesn’t usually need to use his brain much, but I don’t see why winning without having to use his brain is somehow more beautiful. as it turn out, he would have won just by being the fastest in the sprint anyway but it certainly wouldn’t have been more entertaining for the viewer without the tactical element.
 
PS. MVP was fortunate that at the moment he opened up his sprint, the other two came from behind and only disrupted Pogi's. True, in the end, it was Pogi's own fault, but I still think VDP's win was due to cunning rather than strength.
“Fortunate”, do you mean it was luck?
I think it was brilliant timing, VDP completely outplaying Pogacar in that moment. No luck involved.
 
I still don’t get it. He’s trying to win a race. He out-thought Pogacar and played the finale in a way that minimised his chance of losing. For a guy who usually wins just by being the strongest, I thought it was interesting to see him be calculating, clever and ruthless. He doesn’t usually need to use his brain much, but I don’t see why winning without having to use his brain is somehow more beautiful. That certainly wouldn’t have been more entertaining for the viewer without the tactical element.
I get all that, chapeaux VDP, but for me it still was ugly to watch. To each his own and I had no particular interest in seeing Pogi win.